Felicity Ng1, Seetal Dodd, Michael Berk. 1. Department of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, Barwon Health, University of Melbourne, Geelong, Victoria, Australia. felicitn@barwonhealth.org.au
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Physical activity has demonstrated efficacy in depression and anxiety, but its potential in the management of bipolar disorder is yet unexplored. This study is a pilot investigation into the effectiveness of an adjunctive walking program in the acute treatment of bipolar disorder. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of all patients admitted over a 24-month period to a private psychiatric unit with a primary diagnosis of bipolar disorder (ICD-10). All patients were invited to participate voluntarily in a walking group during their admissions. Those who reliably attended the walking group (participants) were compared against those who did not attend (non-participants), using the clinician-rated Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) and Improvement (CGI-I) scales and the self-reported 21-item Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) as primary outcome measures. RESULTS: There were 24 admissions for participants and 74 admissions for non-participants. The two groups did not differ significantly in patient demographics or admission CGI and DASS measures, except for a lower DASS Stress subscore for participants (p=0.049). At discharge, the inter-group differences in CGI measures remained non-significant, but participants had significantly lower scores than non-participants for DASS (p=0.005) and all its subscales (Depression p=0.048, Anxiety p=0.002, Stress p=0.01). LIMITATIONS: Methodological limitations include a retrospective design, small sample size, lack of randomisation or control, and indirect measure of manic symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this trial provide preliminary support for a therapeutic role of physical activity in bipolar disorder, and warrant further investigation with randomised controlled trials.
BACKGROUND: Physical activity has demonstrated efficacy in depression and anxiety, but its potential in the management of bipolar disorder is yet unexplored. This study is a pilot investigation into the effectiveness of an adjunctive walking program in the acute treatment of bipolar disorder. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of all patients admitted over a 24-month period to a private psychiatric unit with a primary diagnosis of bipolar disorder (ICD-10). All patients were invited to participate voluntarily in a walking group during their admissions. Those who reliably attended the walking group (participants) were compared against those who did not attend (non-participants), using the clinician-rated Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) and Improvement (CGI-I) scales and the self-reported 21-item Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) as primary outcome measures. RESULTS: There were 24 admissions for participants and 74 admissions for non-participants. The two groups did not differ significantly in patient demographics or admission CGI and DASS measures, except for a lower DASS Stress subscore for participants (p=0.049). At discharge, the inter-group differences in CGI measures remained non-significant, but participants had significantly lower scores than non-participants for DASS (p=0.005) and all its subscales (Depression p=0.048, Anxiety p=0.002, Stress p=0.01). LIMITATIONS: Methodological limitations include a retrospective design, small sample size, lack of randomisation or control, and indirect measure of manic symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this trial provide preliminary support for a therapeutic role of physical activity in bipolar disorder, and warrant further investigation with randomised controlled trials.
Authors: Melanie M Ashton; Mohammadreza Mohebbi; Alyna Turner; Wolfgang Marx; Michael Berk; Gin S Malhi; Chee H Ng; Sue M Cotton; Seetal Dodd; Jerome Sarris; Malcolm Hopwood; Brendon Stubbs; Olivia M Dean Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2019-11-28 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Gabriela D Colpo; Marion Leboyer; Robert Dantzer; Mahdukar H Trivedi; Antonio L Teixeira Journal: Expert Rev Neurother Date: 2017-11-27 Impact factor: 4.618
Authors: Louisa G Sylvia; Andrew A Nierenberg; Jonathan P Stange; Andrew D Peckham; Thilo Deckersbach Journal: J Psychiatr Pract Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 1.325
Authors: Karlijn Becking; Annet T Spijker; Erik Hoencamp; Brenda W J H Penninx; Robert A Schoevers; Lynn Boschloo Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jerome Sarris; Adrienne O'Neil; Carolyn E Coulson; Isaac Schweitzer; Michael Berk Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2014-04-10 Impact factor: 3.630