Literature DB >> 17182075

Temporal frequency and contrast tagging bias the type of competition in interocular switch rivalry.

Michael A Silver1, Nikos K Logothetis.   

Abstract

The nature of competition underlying perceptual alternations in binocular rivalry remains controversial. Interocular swapping of rivalrous stimuli can result in either slow irregular perceptual alternations that bridge multiple interocular switches or fast regular alternations that are time locked to the stimulus exchanges. We labeled either the inputs to the eyes or the individual rivalrous stimuli using temporal frequency and contrast tagging. Tagging of eye-of-origin signals enhanced the fast regular perceptual alternations associated with eye rivalry, while stimulus tagging shifted perception towards slow irregular alternations characteristic of stimulus rivalry. Thus, the type of competition in binocular rivalry can be biased based on additional cues in the visual inputs. The results are consistent with a model in which the brain combines information across multiple visual features to resolve ambiguities in visual inputs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17182075     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.10.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  11 in total

1.  Endogenous attention selection during binocular rivalry at early stages of visual processing.

Authors:  Jyoti Mishra; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Distinct contributions of the magnocellular and parvocellular visual streams to perceptual selection.

Authors:  Rachel N Denison; Michael A Silver
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  The role of the primary visual cortex in perceptual suppression of salient visual stimuli.

Authors:  Georgios A Keliris; Nikos K Logothetis; Andreas S Tolias
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Binocular vision.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Hugh Wilson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  What is Grouping during Binocular Rivalry?

Authors:  Sjoerd M Stuit; Chris L E Paffen; Maarten J van der Smagt; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Understanding attentional modulation of binocular rivalry: a framework based on biased competition.

Authors:  Kevin Conrad Dieter; Duje Tadin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  High-level binocular rivalry effects.

Authors:  Michal Wolf; Shaul Hochstein
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 8.  The Certainty of Ambiguity in Visual Neural Representations.

Authors:  Jan W Brascamp; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 7.745

9.  Image-based grouping during binocular rivalry is dictated by eye-of-origin.

Authors:  Sjoerd M Stuit; Chris L E Paffen; Maarten J van der Smagt; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Binocular flash suppression in the primary visual cortex of anesthetized and awake macaques.

Authors:  Hamed Bahmani; Yusuke Murayama; Nikos K Logothetis; Georgios A Keliris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.