Literature DB >> 17179394

Peripheral arteries in diabetic patients: standard bolus-chase and time-resolved MR angiography.

Gustav Andreisek1, Thomas Pfammatter, Kerstin Goepfert, Daniel Nanz, Patrice Hervo, Renate Koppensteiner, Dominik Weishaupt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively determine the diagnostic performance of a combination of standard bolus-chase magnetic resonance (MR) angiography and MR angiography with time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) for depicting severity of peripheral vascular disease of the lower extremity, including the pedal arteries, in diabetic patients with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An ethical committee approved this study; written informed consent was obtained from patients. Standard three-station and TRICKS MR angiography of the calf and foot were performed in 31 consecutive diabetic patients (23 men, eight women; mean age, 67 years; range, 43-81 years). Two readers separately assessed images of arterial segments as diagnostic or nondiagnostic and graded stenosis. Results were compared with those at DSA when the corresponding arterial segments were considered diagnostic at DSA. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to determine if a significant difference between imaging techniques existed, and kappa statistics were used to determine interobserver agreement.
RESULTS: The difference between standard MR angiography and DSA regarding the number of diagnostic segments in the thigh was not significant (P = .50). A significantly higher number of calf and foot segments was considered diagnostic at TRICKS MR angiography than at standard MR angiography (P < .025). Sixteen of 26 segments in the foot that were considered nondiagnostic at DSA were considered diagnostic at TRICKS MR angiography. Average sensitivity of standard MR angiography for depicting hemodynamically significant arterial stenosis was 84% (reader 1) and 83% (reader 2) in the thigh and 78% (reader 1) and 80% (reader 2) in the calf. For both readers, average specificity was 97% in the thigh and 90% in the calf. Sensitivity and specificity of TRICKS MR angiography in the calf and foot were improved compared with those at standard MR angiography.
CONCLUSION: TRICKS MR angiography of the distal calf and pedal vessels is superior to standard MR angiography regarding the number of diagnostic segments and assessment of the degree of luminal narrowing. (c) RSNA, 2007.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17179394     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2422051111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  24 in total

1.  Time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography of spinal vascular malformations.

Authors:  M Amarouche; J L Hart; A Siddiqui; T Hampton; D C Walsh
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the calf station at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparison of non-enhanced ECG-gated flow-dependent MRA, continuous table movement MRA and time-resolved MRA.

Authors:  Stefan Haneder; Ulrike I Attenberger; Philipp Riffel; Thomas Henzler; Stefan O Schoenberg; Henrik J Michaely
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Diagnostic value of time-resolved CT angiography for the lower leg.

Authors:  Wieland H Sommer; Andreas Helck; Fabian Bamberg; Edda Albrecht; Christoph R Becker; Rolf Weidenhagen; Harald Kramer; Maximilian F Reiser; Konstantin Nikolaou
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Magnetic resonance angiography of fetal vessels: feasibility study in the sheep fetus.

Authors:  Jin Yamamura; Bernhard Schnackenburg; Hendrik Kooijmann; Michael Frisch; Kurt Hecher; Gerhard Adam; Ulrike Wedegärtner
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  Unenhanced calf MR angiography at 3.0 T using electrocardiography-gated partial-fourier fast spin echo imaging with variable flip angle.

Authors:  Dan Li; Jiang Lin; Fuhua Yan; Qingyuan Wu; Weiwei Lv; Yan San; Hong Yun
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Traumatic Lateral Plantar Artery Pseudoaneurysm and the Use of Time-Resolved MR Angiography.

Authors:  Akira M Murakami; Anthony Chang; Li Foong Foo
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2010-07-07

9.  String-like lumen in below-the-knee chronic total occlusions on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography predicts intraluminal recanalization and better blood flow restoration.

Authors:  Yue-Qi Zhu; Hai-Tao Lu; Li-Ming Wei; Fang Liu; Ying-Sheng Cheng; Jian-Bo Wang; Jun-Gong Zhao
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-10-30       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Recent advances in 3D time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography.

Authors:  Stephen J Riederer; Clifton R Haider; Eric A Borisch; Paul T Weavers; Phillip M Young
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.