OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate and to show the range of appearance of transient hepatic signal intensity differences when not associated with focal lesions, and to correlate morphology, cause, and pathogenesis. CONCLUSION: Hepatic arterial phenomena, visualized on MRI and CT, must be considered important signs of underlying liver disorders, which these phenomena contribute to evaluate. Accordingly, the hepatic arterial phase must always be performed on MRI as well as on CT, even if no focal lesion is expected.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate and to show the range of appearance of transient hepatic signal intensity differences when not associated with focal lesions, and to correlate morphology, cause, and pathogenesis. CONCLUSION: Hepatic arterial phenomena, visualized on MRI and CT, must be considered important signs of underlying liver disorders, which these phenomena contribute to evaluate. Accordingly, the hepatic arterial phase must always be performed on MRI as well as on CT, even if no focal lesion is expected.
Authors: Daniel A Feeney; Leslie C Sharkey; Susan M Steward; Katherine L Bahr; Michael S Henson; Daisuke Ito; Timothy D O'Brien; Carl R Jessen; Brian D Husbands; Antonella Borgatti; Jaime F Modiano Journal: Comp Med Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 0.982
Authors: Richard M Gore; Kiran H Thakrar; Daniel R Wenzke; Geraldine M Newmark; Uday K Mehta; Jonathan W Berlin Journal: Cancer Imaging Date: 2012-09-28 Impact factor: 3.909