Literature DB >> 17179324

Development of a cathartic-free colorectal cancer screening test using virtual colonoscopy: a feasibility study.

Kristina T Johnson1, Michael J Carston, Robert J Wentz, Armando Manduca, Steven M Anderson, C Daniel Johnson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to develop a method to subtract barium-labeled stool from the colon using a phantom and to evaluate the performance of the technique in a pilot human population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A phantom containing 6-mm flat polyps and three types of simulated stool (homogeneous, moderately heterogeneous, and severely heterogeneous) mixed with barium was created, scanned, and tested using three stool subtraction algorithms but no cathartic. Thirty patients with suspected colorectal polyps were studied using stool tagging to determine which was the most effective stool subtraction algorithm. Colonoscopy was the reference standard. Examinations were evaluated blindly using the unsubtracted and 6 weeks later both the unsubtracted and subtracted data sets.
RESULTS: A threshold of 200 H and expansion and convolution techniques were the most effective tools for subtracting stool and minimizing artifacts. When applied to the human population, sensitivities using the unsubtracted data sets were 90% (18/20) and 68% (26/38) for polyps > or = 1 cm and > or = 5 mm, respectively. Specificities were 100% (4/4) and 75% (3/4) for polyps > or = 1 cm and > or = 5 mm. For the stool-subtracted data sets, sensitivities were 90% (18/20) and 71% (27/38) for polyps > or = 1 cm and > or = 5 mm. Per patient sensitivities were 88% (15/17) and 77% (20/26) for > or = 1 cm and > or = 5 mm polyps. Specificities were 100% (4/4) for large polyps and 25% (1/4) for smaller polyps.
CONCLUSION: Image processing tools combining thresholding, expansion, and convolution were the most useful for stool subtraction. Laxative-free colon examinations using barium for stool labeling can be performed at CT colonography with or without stool subtraction with high accuracy. Further study is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17179324     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.1484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  12 in total

1.  Colon capsule endoscopy: Advantages, limitations and expectations. Which novelties?

Authors:  Maria Elena Riccioni; Riccardo Urgesi; Rossella Cianci; Alessandra Bizzotto; Cristiano Spada; Guido Costamagna
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-04-16

Review 2.  Colon capsule endoscopy.

Authors:  Ignacio Fernandez-Urien; Cristina Carretero; Ana Borda; Miguel Muñoz-Navas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Informatics in radiology: Electronic cleansing for noncathartic CT colonography: a structure-analysis scheme.

Authors:  Wenli Cai; Hiroyuki Yoshida; Michael E Zalis; Janne Johannes Näppi; Gordon J Harris
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Mosaic decomposition: an electronic cleansing method for inhomogeneously tagged regions in noncathartic CT colonography.

Authors:  Wenli Cai; June-Goo Lee; Michael E Zalis; Hiroyuki Yoshida
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Colorectal neoplasm: magnetic resonance colonography with fat enema-initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Shuai Zhang; Jun-Wei Peng; Qiang-Ying Shi; Feng Tang; Min-Guo Zhong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Single-center study comparing computed tomography colonography with conventional colonoscopy.

Authors:  Ian C Roberts-Thomson; Graeme R Tucker; Peter J Hewett; Peter Cheung; Ruben A Sebben; E E Win Khoo; Julie D Marker; Wayne K Clapton
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Barriers to screening colonoscopy in an urban population: a study to help focus further efforts to attain full compliance.

Authors:  Vishal Ghevariya; Sushil Duddempudi; Nehal Ghevariya; Madhavi Reddy; Sury Anand
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Virtual tagging for laxative-free CT colonography: pilot evaluation.

Authors:  Janne Näppi; Hiroyuki Yoshida
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  CT colonography for synchronous colorectal lesions in patients with colorectal cancer: initial experience.

Authors:  D R McArthur; H Mehrzad; R Patel; J Dadds; A Pallan; S S Karandikar; S Roy-Choudhury
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  CT colonography with minimal bowel preparation: evaluation of tagging quality, patient acceptance and diagnostic accuracy in two iodine-based preparation schemes.

Authors:  Marjolein H Liedenbaum; A H de Vries; C I B F Gouw; A F van Rijn; S Bipat; E Dekker; J Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.