Literature DB >> 17178677

Cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators: in vitro magnetic resonance imaging evaluation at 1.5-tesla.

Frank G Shellock1, Laura Fischer, David S Fieno.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) performed at 1.5-Tesla on current generation pacemakers and ICDs to identify safe parameters for MRI examinations.
METHODS: Pacemakers (Identity ADx XL DR+ 5386 and Identity ADx DR + 5380 generators; 1688T/52-cm atrial and ventricular leads) and ICDs (Atlas + V-243, Epic + V-236, and Epic + HF V-350 generators; Riata 1581/65-cm and QuickSite 1056K/75-cm leads; St. Jude Medical, Sylmar, California, USA) were evaluated for magnetic field interactions. MRI-related heating was assessed using various levels of RF power (SARs) and conditions that included scans on different body regions. Functional aspects of the devices were evaluated immediately before and after MRI procedures utilizing nine different pulse sequences. Induced currents were measured using a custom built system.
RESULTS: Magnetic field interactions will not create a hazard for these pacemakers and ICDs. All scans of the "head" and "lumbar" regions resulted in temperature changes < or =0.5 degrees C at SARs ranging from 2.0 to 3.0-W/kg. For the "chest" area, temperature increases ranged from 0.4 degrees C to 3.6 degrees C at an SAR of 2.0-W/kg. No memory corruption, hardware changes, or changes in device parameters were seen. Magnetic field gradients have a low likelihood of inducing currents that would stimulate the heart.
CONCLUSIONS: No hazardous magnetic field interactions or physiologically significant heating occurred for certain conditions. There was no permanent effect on device function. By following specific conditions, these pacemakers and ICDs may be safe for patients scanned at 1.5-Tesla.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17178677     DOI: 10.1080/10976640600897237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson        ISSN: 1097-6647            Impact factor:   5.364


  16 in total

1.  Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with permanent pacemakers: a collaborative clinical approach.

Authors:  Barry Anthony Boilson; Anita Wokhlu; Nancy G Acker; Joel P Felmlee; Robert E Watson; Paul R Julsrud; Paul A Friedman; Yong-Mei Cha; Robert F Rea; David L Hayes; Win-Kuang Shen
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  Imaging sequences in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: current role, evolving applications, and technical challenges.

Authors:  El-Sayed H Ibrahim
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Computed tomography in patients with cardiac pacemakers: difficulties and solutions.

Authors:  Rafal Mlynarski; Maciej Sosnowski; Agnieszka Mlynarska; Michał Tendera
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  The effect of simulation strategies on prediction of power deposition in the tissue around electronic implants during magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Bach T Nguyen; Julie Pilitsis; Laleh Golestanirad
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Safety of retained microcatheters: an evaluation of radiofrequency heating in endovascular microcatheters with nitinol, tungsten, and polyetheretherketone braiding at 1.5 T and 3 T.

Authors:  Aaron D Losey; Prasheel Lillaney; Alastair J Martin; Van V Halbach; Daniel L Cooke; Christopher F Dowd; Randall T Higashida; David A Saloner; Mark W Wilson; Maythem Saeed; Steven W Hetts
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 5.836

6.  Three-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Patients With Deep Brain Stimulators: Results From a Phantom Study and a Pilot Study in Patients.

Authors:  Benjamin Davidson; Fred Tam; Benson Yang; Ying Meng; Clement Hamani; Simon J Graham; Nir Lipsman
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Changes in the specific absorption rate (SAR) of radiofrequency energy in patients with retained cardiac leads during MRI at 1.5T and 3T.

Authors:  Laleh Golestanirad; Amir Ali Rahsepar; John E Kirsch; Kenichiro Suwa; Jeremy C Collins; Leonardo M Angelone; Boris Keil; Rod S Passman; Giorgio Bonmassar; Peter Serano; Peter Krenz; Jim DeLap; James C Carr; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  MRI-Guided Electrophysiology Intervention.

Authors:  Henry R Halperin; Aravindan Kolandaivelu
Journal:  Rambam Maimonides Med J       Date:  2010-10-31

Review 9.  Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac pacemakers: era of "MR Conditional" designs.

Authors:  Jerold S Shinbane; Patrick M Colletti; Frank G Shellock
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 10.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance guided electrophysiology studies.

Authors:  Aravindan Kolandaivelu; Albert C Lardo; Henry R Halperin
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.