Literature DB >> 17176986

Evaluation of three scoring systems predicting non sentinel node metastasis in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy.

Christine E Dauphine1, Jason S Haukoos, Maria P Vargas, Nova M Isaac, Iraj Khalkhali, Hernan I Vargas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND), performed after a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer patients, often results in no additional positive nodes. Scoring systems have been published to aid in the prediction of nonsentinel node metastasis. Our purpose was to assess the validity of these scoring systems in our patient population.
METHODS: For 39 consecutive patients who underwent cALND after a positive SLNB, scores were calculated using retrospective patient data for each of the three scoring systems used. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were drawn, and the areas under the curves were calculated to assess the discriminative power of each system. Univariate analysis was performed to assess the predictability of individual patient and tumor characteristics.
RESULTS: Nonsentinel nodes were positive in 23 (59%) patients. The areas under the ROC curves were 0.63, 0.70, and 0.68, respectively. The proportion of sentinel nodes that were positive and the total number of sentinel nodes retrieved were the only individual predictors of nonsentinel node metastasis.
CONCLUSIONS: Given the high incidence of retrieving no additional metastasis on cALND, individualized patient management according to risk is desirable. Scoring systems provide additional information regarding the likelihood of metastasis in nonsentinel nodes, but their predictability remains less than optimal. The use of scoring systems must be applied with caution until future studies provide a more accurate assessment of risk for patients with a positive SLNB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17176986     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-006-9223-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  11 in total

Review 1.  Sentinel Lymph Nodes for Breast Carcinoma: A Paradigm Shift.

Authors:  Aoife Maguire; Edi Brogi
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.534

2.  Correlation between serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor-C and sentinel lymph node status in early breast cancer.

Authors:  Diego Pérez; Alexander Rohde; Gonzalo Callejón; Elisabeth Pérez-Ruiz; Isabel Rodrigo; Francisco Rivas-Ruiz; Belen Ramos; Francisco Medina; Rosa Villatoro; Maximino Redondo; Irene Zarcos; Claudio Maañón; Antonio Rueda
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-06-24

3.  Comparison of two models for predicting non-sentinel lymph node metastases in sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Giovanni D'Eredita'; Vito Leopoldo Troilo; Fernando Fischetti; Giuseppe Rubini; Tommaso Berardi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2011-05-31

4.  Predictive factors for non-sentinel lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node: should we consider sentinel node-related factors?

Authors:  J L Fougo; M Afonso; F Senhorães Senra; T Dias; C Leal; C Araújo; M Dinis-Ribeiro
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Multicenter validation of two nomograms to predict non-sentinel node involvement in breast cancer.

Authors:  Antonio Piñero; Manuel Canteras; Arancha Moreno; Francisco Vicente; Julia Giménez; Ana Tocino; Edelmiro Iglesias; Sergi Vidal-Sicart; Luzdivina Santamaría; Miguel Lorenzo; Manuel García; Diego Ramirez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  A new and simple predictive formula for non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes, and validation of 3 different nomograms in Turkish breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Levent Yeniay; Erdem Carti; Can Karaca; Osman Zekioglu; Ulkem Yararbas; Rasih Yilmaz; Murat Kapkac
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Predictors of nonsentinel nodal involvement to aid intraoperative decision making in breast cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes.

Authors:  Ern Yu Tan; Bernard Ho; Juliana J C Chen; Pey Woei Ho; Christine Teo; Arul Earnest; Patrick M Y Chan
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2011-08-16

8.  Prediction of non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: evaluation of the tenon score.

Authors:  Y Andersson; J Frisell; J de Boniface; L Bergkvist
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2012-01-30

9.  New models and online calculator for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Holbrook E Kohrt; Richard A Olshen; Honnie R Bermas; William H Goodson; Douglas J Wood; Solomon Henry; Robert V Rouse; Lisa Bailey; Vicki J Philben; Frederick M Dirbas; Jocelyn J Dunn; Denise L Johnson; Irene L Wapnir; Robert W Carlson; Frank E Stockdale; Nora M Hansen; Stefanie S Jeffrey
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Comparison of five different popular scoring systems to predict nonsentinel lymph node status in patients with metastatic sentinel lymph nodes: a tertiary care center experience.

Authors:  Ramazan Yıldız; Murat Urkan; Oğuz Hancerliogulları; Zafer Kılbaş; Erkan Ozturk; Mustafa Oner Mentes; Semih Gorgulu
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-10-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.