Literature DB >> 17176238

Federal, State and Territory government responses to health inequities and the social determinants of health in Australia.

Lareen Newman1, Fran Baum, Elizabeth Harris.   

Abstract

ISSUE ADDRESSED: Planned actions by governments can play an important part in addressing the social determinants of health and health inequities. We assess the extent to which Australian health departments are committed to health equity as a core value, and the extent to which strategic directions and policies show evidence of action and achievement in reducing health inequities and attention to the social determinants of health.
METHODS: Key documents guiding each health department since 2000 were sought from a key informant in each jurisdiction (State/Territory/federal). An analysis was made of the content in terms of stated values, strategies, objectives, intended and current initiatives, collaborations, funding, and reporting of achievements in relation to the reduction of health inequities and the attention accorded to the social determinants of health.
RESULTS: All jurisdictions are explicitly or implicitly committed to reducing health inequities and to addressing the social determinants of health to at least a limited extent. The extent of commitment varies from those who make a clear statement of the importance of achieving health equity at both whole-of-government and health department level, to others who have extremely limited commitment. There is also variation in the extent to which directions are transformed into planned initiatives to improve health outcomes or access to health services for disadvantaged groups or areas, and variations in the degree of monitoring and evaluation.
CONCLUSION: Although substantial health inequities exist in Australia there is explicit or implicit recognition of the underlying value of equity within all jurisdictions and some policies designed to increase health equity in all. However, in most jurisdictions health equity could be more explicitly incorporated into core government and health department strategies and initiatives, and there is room for the development of the capacity to monitor change over time in access to services, quality of care, and improved health outcomes.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17176238     DOI: 10.1071/he06217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot J Austr        ISSN: 1036-1073


  5 in total

1.  To what extent do Australian child and youth health policies address the social determinants of health and health equity?: a document analysis study.

Authors:  Clare Phillips; Matt Fisher; Fran Baum; Colin MacDougall; Lareen Newman; Dennis McDermott
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Intervention mapping to address social and economic factors impacting indigenous people's health in Suriname's interior region.

Authors:  Daniel Peplow; Sarah Augustine
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.185

3.  Health service utilisation associated with chronic breathlessness: random population sample.

Authors:  David C Currow; Sungwon Chang; Magnus Ekström; Ann Hutchinson; Tim Luckett; Slavica Kochovska; Phillipa Hay; Stephen Touyz; Eleonora Dal Grande; Miriam J Johnson
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2021-10-11

4.  Disparities in child health in the Arab region during the 1990s.

Authors:  Marwan Khawaja; Jesse Dawns; Sonya Meyerson-Knox; Rouham Yamout
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2008-11-20

5.  Qualitative protocol for understanding the contribution of Australian policy in the urban planning, justice, energy and environment sectors to promoting health and health equity.

Authors:  Fran Baum; Toni Delany-Crowe; Matthew Fisher; Colin MacDougall; Patrick Harris; Dennis McDermott; Dora Marinova
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.