Literature DB >> 17175513

Effect of aviation snip design and task height on upper extremity muscular activity and wrist posture.

Dan Anton1, Fredric Gerr, Alysha Meyers, Thomas M Cook, John C Rosecrance, Jonathan Reynolds.   

Abstract

Hand tools described as ergonomic in design are intended to reduce exposure to physical risk factors associated with work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Additionally, using the right tool for the job is believed to reduce exposure and, consequently, risk of disease. Sheet metal workers frequently use a cutting tool called aviation snips when fabricating and installing ductwork. The purpose of this laboratory simulation study was to determine the effect of (1) aviation snip design; and (2) work height on muscle activity, wrist posture, and user satisfaction among sheet metal workers. We hypothesized that specific aviation snips designs would be most appropriate for use at specific heights. Twenty-three sheet metal workers used three different designs of aviation snips to make curved cuts in sheet metal placed both at waist height and shoulder height. Conventional circular snips, straight snips, and an alternate design of offset snips were used. Upper extremity muscle activity was measured with surface electromyography, wrist posture was measured with electrogoniometry, and user satisfaction was rated by the participants on a survey. Statistically significant effects of snip design and task height on muscle activity, wrist posture, and user satisfaction were observed. However, no snip was preferable for all dependent variables. Work height had a greater effect on muscle activity and wrist posture than snip design. Field studies are indicated to determine the long-term effect of snip design on physical risk factors and risk of musculoskeletal disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17175513     DOI: 10.1080/15459620601117087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  3 in total

1.  FLS tasks can be used as an ergonomic discriminator between laparoscopic and robotic surgery.

Authors:  Ahmed M Zihni; Ikechukwu Ohu; Jaime A Cavallo; Jenny Ousley; Sohyung Cho; Michael M Awad
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Ergonomic analysis of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Ahmed M Zihni; Ikechukwu Ohu; Jaime A Cavallo; Sohyung Cho; Michael M Awad
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Biomechanical factors during common agricultural activities: Results of on-farm exposure assessments using direct measurement methods.

Authors:  Nathan B Fethke; Mark C Schall; Howard Chen; Cassidy A Branch; Linda A Merlino
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 2.155

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.