Literature DB >> 17174807

Coronary vasodilator reserve and Framingham risk scores in subjects at risk for coronary artery disease.

Sharmila Dorbala1, Alita Hassan, Therese Heinonen, Heinrich R Schelbert, Marcelo F Di Carli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relationship between coronary vasodilator reserve and risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) in subjects without coronary artery disease (CAD) is not well known. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We studied 289 subjects (mean age, 58 +/- 10 years) without overt CAD and at low (< 10%) to intermediate risk (10%-20%) for CHD based on Framingham risk scores (RAMPART [Relative and Absolute Myocardial Perfusion changes as measured by Positron Emission Tomography to Assess the Effects of ACAT Inhibition: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Trial]). Coronary flow reserve (CFR) and coronary vascular resistance (CVR) were calculated from rest and adenosine nitrogen 13 ammonia positron emission tomography studies. Framingham-estimated CHD risk was used to as a surrogate for outcomes. Compared with subjects with low-risk scores (n = 150), those with intermediate-risk scores (n = 139) had a higher minimal CVR (49.3 +/- 17.41 mm Hg x mL(-1) x min(-1) x g(-1) vs 52.4 +/- 16.4 mm Hg x mL(-1) x min(-1) x g(-1), P = .05) and lower CFR (2.8 +/- 1.0 vs 2.5 +/- 0.8, P = .02). CFR was inversely related to CHD risk (R = -0.2, P = .006), and CVR was directly related to CHD risk (R = 0.2, P < .001). The mean CFR was significantly lower in patients in the first quartile of CHD risk compared with those in the fourth quartile (2.3 +/- 0.7 vs 2.8 +/- 1.0, P = .02), and the minimal CVR was significantly higher (44 +/- 15 mm Hg x mL(-1) x min(-1) x g(-1) vs 53 +/- 14 mm Hg x mL(-1) x min(-1) x g(-1), P < or = .05).
CONCLUSIONS: In subjects without clinical CAD and at low to intermediate risk, CFR assessed by positron emission tomography is inversely related to estimated 10-year CHD risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17174807     DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2006.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  21 in total

1.  Prevention Conference V: Beyond secondary prevention: identifying the high-risk patient for primary prevention: medical office assessment: Writing Group I.

Authors:  S M Grundy; T Bazzarre; J Cleeman; R B D'Agostino; M Hill; N Houston-Miller; W B Kannel; R Krauss; H M Krumholz; R M Lauer; I S Ockene; R C Pasternak; T Pearson; P M Ridker; D Wood
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-01-04       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Long-term follow-up of patients with mild coronary artery disease and endothelial dysfunction.

Authors:  J A Suwaidi; S Hamasaki; S T Higano; R A Nishimura; D R Holmes; A Lerman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-03-07       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Physiological basis of clinically used coronary hemodynamic indices.

Authors:  Jos A E Spaan; Jan J Piek; Julien I E Hoffman; Maria Siebes
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Metabolic syndrome vs Framingham Risk Score for prediction of coronary heart disease, stroke, and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  S Goya Wannamethee; A Gerald Shaper; Lucy Lennon; Richard W Morris
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005 Dec 12-26

5.  Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories.

Authors:  P W Wilson; R B D'Agostino; D Levy; A M Belanger; H Silbershatz; W B Kannel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-05-12       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis--an update.

Authors:  R Ross
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-02-20       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Summary of the second report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel II)

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-06-16       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Reduced coronary flow reserve in hypercholesterolemic patients without overt coronary stenosis.

Authors:  I Yokoyama; T Ohtake; S Momomura; J Nishikawa; Y Sasaki; M Omata
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-12-15       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Quantitative relation between hemodynamic changes during intravenous adenosine infusion and the magnitude of coronary hyperemia: implications for myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Rakesh K Mishra; Sharmila Dorbala; Giridhar Logsetty; Alita Hassan; Therese Heinonen; Heinrich R Schelbert; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Early detection of abnormal coronary flow reserve in asymptomatic men at high risk for coronary artery disease using positron emission tomography.

Authors:  F Dayanikli; D Grambow; O Muzik; L Mosca; M Rubenfire; M Schwaiger
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  11 in total

1.  Insulin resistance is a major determinant of myocardial blood flow impairment in anginal patients.

Authors:  Riccardo Liga; Daniele Rovai; Tiziana Sampietro; Cecilia Vecoli; Giancarlo Todiere; Chiara Caselli; Giuseppe Rossi; Antonio L'abbate; Danilo Neglia
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Partial volume correction incorporating Rb-82 positron range for quantitative myocardial perfusion PET based on systolic-diastolic activity ratios and phantom measurements.

Authors:  Nils P Johnson; Stefano Sdringola; K Lance Gould
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  CT-based attenuation correction in (82)Rb-myocardial perfusion PET-CT: incidence of misalignment and effect on regional tracer distribution.

Authors:  Riikka Lautamäki; Tracy L Y Brown; Jennifer Merrill; Frank M Bengel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Detecting the impact of emerging cardiovascular risk factors: the role of positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Danilo Neglia; Oberdan Parodi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Cardiac PET/CT for the evaluation of known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Marcelo F Di Carli; Venkatesh L Murthy
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 6.  Assessment of myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve with positron emission tomography in ischemic heart disease: current state and future directions.

Authors:  Firas Al Badarin; Ahmed Aljizeeri; Fatimah Almasoudi; Mouaz H Al-Mallah
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 7.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion and function with PET and PET/CT.

Authors:  Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Arkadiusz Sitek; Stephen C Moore; Marcelo Di Carli; Sharmila Dorbala
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Rubidium-82 PET-CT for quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow: validation in a canine model of coronary artery stenosis.

Authors:  Riikka Lautamäki; Richard T George; Kakuya Kitagawa; Takahiro Higuchi; Jennifer Merrill; Corina Voicu; Anthony DiPaula; Stephan G Nekolla; João A C Lima; Albert C Lardo; Frank M Bengel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Cardiovascular risk, obesity, and myocardial blood flow in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Apurva A Motivala; Patricia A Rose; H Myra Kim; Yolanda R Smith; Catherine Bartnik; Robert D Brook; Otto Muzik; Claire S Duvernoy
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Vascular dysfunction measured by fingertip thermal monitoring is associated with the extent of myocardial perfusion defect.

Authors:  Naser Ahmadi; Nudrat Usman; John Shim; Vivek Nuguri; Panukorn Vasinrapee; Fereshteh Hajsadeghi; Zhiying Wang; Gary P Foster; Khurram Nasir; Harvey Hecht; Morteza Naghavi; Matthew Budoff
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.