Literature DB >> 17174770

Resorbable plates for the fixation of mandibular fractures: a prospective study.

Robert M Laughlin1, Michael S Block, Randall Wilk, Randolph B Malloy, John N Kent.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The hypothesis for this prospective evaluation is that resorbable plates are equal to the performance of titanium 2-mm plates, regarding healing of the fracture with bone union and restoration of function. To prove this hypothesis, specific end points will be compared with literature norms for titanium 2-mm miniplate rigid fixation. The primary end point variable for this analysis is the union of the fracture and return to normal function. Secondary end point variables included the incidence of complications such as infection, malunion with malocclusion, soft tissue dehiscence, the need for revision surgery, specific technical challenges, operative time, and the learning curve for the surgeon. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective study consisted of a sequential enrollment of 50 fractures that met the inclusion criteria of having a fracture of the mandibular body, symphysis, angle, or ramus, and required an open reduction and internal fixation for stabilization and repair. The resorbable plates and screws used consisted of an amorphous injection molded copolymer of L-lactide/D-lactide/trimethylene carbonate (Inion CPS system, Tampere, Finland). Data were collated and compared with literature norms for titanium plates and also compared with nonrigid fixation data from a prospective study performed on a similar population in the same institution.
RESULTS: Clinical and radiographic evaluation indicated union of all fractures at the eighth follow-up visit. Three sites (6%) noted to have clinical signs of infection were treated immediately upon presentation, with fracture union by 8 weeks. There was no need for revision surgery in this series of patients; 12 screw heads fractured during screw placement and were immediately replaced without significant fracture sequelae.
CONCLUSION: Based on this limited series of patients, the hypothesis formulated for this study was validated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17174770     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.10.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  22 in total

1.  Does the Relationship between Retained Mandibular Third Molar and Mandibular Angle Fracture Exist? An Assessment of Three Possible Causes.

Authors:  Bruno G Duarte; Diogo Assis; Paulo Ribeiro-Júnior; Eduardo Sanches Gonçales
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2012-09

2.  Biodegradable fixation for craniomaxillofacial surgery: a 10-year experience involving 761 operations and 745 patients.

Authors:  T A Turvey; W P Proffit; C Phillips
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 2.789

3.  Delayed foreign-body reaction to absorbable implants in metacarpal fracture treatment.

Authors:  Panagiotis K Givissis; Stavros I Stavridis; Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos; Petros D Antonarakos; Anastasios G Christodoulou
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  [Implant materials for the internal fixation of midfacial fractures].

Authors:  B A Stuck; T Heller
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Peculiarities of employment of polymeric miniplates for mandibular osteosynthesis: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Yan Vares
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2013-03

Review 6.  Coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus: Current concepts and surgical techniques.

Authors:  Jay J Watson; Simon Bellringer; Joideep Phadnis
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2019-02-13

7.  Delayed Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection on a Mandibular Angle Fracture with Absorbable Plates.

Authors:  Han Moi Choi; Soon Heum Kim; Cheol Keun Kim; Hyun Gon Choi; Dong Hyeok Shin; Ki Il Uhm; Dongin Jo
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2015-03-16

8.  Injectable biomaterials for regenerating complex craniofacial tissues.

Authors:  James D Kretlow; Simon Young; Leda Klouda; Mark Wong; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 30.849

9.  Rib fracture repair: indications, technical issues, and future directions.

Authors:  Raminder Nirula; Jose J Diaz; Donald D Trunkey; John C Mayberry
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Setbacks of bio-resorbable plates and screws in the management of condylar fractures: our experience.

Authors:  N Chaithanyaa; K K Rai; K V Arun Kumar; Kapil Lahoti
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-05-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.