Literature DB >> 17174284

What determines sustained visual attention? The impact of distracter positions, task difficulty and visual fields compared.

Antje Kraft1, Nele Pape, Herbert Hagendorf, Sein Schmidt, Aki Naito, Stephan A Brandt.   

Abstract

We quantified the interference of distracter stimuli on sustained visuo-spatial attention as a function of the distribution of attended positions in the visual fields (bilateral/unilateral, left/right, upper/lower), distracter positions (peripheral, between attended positions, between fixation and attended positions) and task difficulty. Compared to distinct distracter positions, bilateral field and lower field presentation had much stronger influence on the performance. Additionally, interactive effects between task difficulty and distracter position were found. This result was at variance with the previous models of visuo-spatial attention, which attached much more importance to the role of distracter positions compared to visual field effects. In directly comparing the impact of the abovementioned factors, the converse finding is evident-visual field effects, in particular bilateral presentations have a much stronger importance. Moreover, metaphoric concepts of attention like the "zoom lens" are not compatible with these results. The findings are discussed in the light of alternative models of sustained visuo-spatial attention. The visual system architecture and top-down mechanisms are considered.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17174284     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.11.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  7 in total

1.  A bilateral advantage for storage in visual working memory.

Authors:  Akina Umemoto; Trafton Drew; Edward F Ester; Edward Awh
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-07-24

2.  Dynamic upper and lower visual field preferences within the human dorsal frontoparietal attention network.

Authors:  Antje Kraft; Wieland H Sommer; Sein Schmidt; Stephan A Brandt
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Flexible attention system: Appearance time of split attention changes in accordance with the task difficulty level.

Authors:  Guangyao Zu; Hanbin Sang; Heng Zhou; Fan Zhang; Xiaogang Wu; Aijun Wang; Ming Zhang
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 2.157

4.  Bilateral field advantage in visual crowding.

Authors:  Ramakrishna Chakravarthi; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Interhemispheric integration in visual search.

Authors:  Stewart Shipp
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Cooperation or competition of the two hemispheres in processing characters presented at vertical midline.

Authors:  Rolf Verleger; Marie Dittmer; Kamila Smigasiewicz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Dynamic spatial coding within the dorsal frontoparietal network during a visual search task.

Authors:  Wieland H Sommer; Antje Kraft; Sein Schmidt; Manuel C Olma; Stephan A Brandt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.