Literature DB >> 17174020

Evaluation of the enamel etching capacity of six contemporary self-etching adhesives.

Geneviève Grégoire1, Yasin Ahmed.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the capacity of six contemporary self-etch primers/adhesives to demineralize ground enamel by means of ultrastructural analysis of the etching surface under SEM and by spectroscopic measurement of the percentage of calcium and phosphate ions dissolved.
METHODS: Seventy non-carious extracted human third molars were sub-divided into 2 groups of 35 teeth each. The teeth of the first group were ground to expose flat, polished enamel surfaces 3-4mm thick. The samples thus obtained were treated with six self-etch bonding systems and a phosphoric acid gel (control group). The self-etch priming agent was then eliminated and the etched enamel surface observed by SEM. From the teeth of the second group, disc-shaped specimens were made from ground enamel and subjected to application of each of the six self-etchants. Once the etching product had been rinsed off, the rinse solution was analyzed by atomic flame spectroscopy to evaluate the percentage of calcium and phosphate ions dissolved.
RESULTS: SEM images show that AdheSE, Adper Prompt L-Pop and Xeno III, despite having a less intensive etching efficacy than phosphoric acid, gave a regular pattern over a considerable surface area and depth. iBond and One-Up Bond F gave less regular demineralization. For Clearfil SE Bond, the demineralization was ineffective. Results of the percentage of mineral loss show that Adper Prompt L-Pop and Xeno III were the most efficient self-etch products. AdheSE, iBond and One-Up Bond F, respectively exhibited decreasing demineralizing capacity. Clearfil SE Bond, however, gave low proportions of calcium and phosphate ions loss and was considered unsatisfactory.
CONCLUSION: The action on enamel was not the same for all self-etch systems tested. The etching potential of the self-etch adhesives was lower than that of phosphoric acid but some self-etch systems, particularly those with monomers containing phosphate derivatives, gave results close to those obtained with phosphoric acid.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17174020     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2006.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  4 in total

1.  A comparative study of clinical effectiveness of fissure sealing with and without bonding systems: 3-year results.

Authors:  C Sakkas; L Khomenko; I Trachuk
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2013-04-03

2.  An all-in-one adhesive does not etch beyond hybrid layers.

Authors:  J Kim; S Mai; M R Carrilho; C K Y Yiu; D H Pashley; F R Tay
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  A randomized control clinical trial of fissure sealant retention: Self etch adhesive versus total etch adhesive.

Authors:  Nadia Aman; Farhan Reza Khan; Aisha Salim; Huma Farid
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

4.  Interfacial integrity of bonded restorations with self-etching adhesives: Water storage and thermo-mechanical cycling.

Authors:  Gislaine Cristine Martins; Alfonso Sánchez-Ayala; Paulo Henrique Perlatti D'Alpino; Abraham Lincoln Calixto; João Carlos Gomes; Osnara Maria Mongruel Gomes
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2012-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.