PURPOSE: This study is part of an ongoing National Cancer Institute multidisciplinary, etiologically-focused, cross-sectional study of Familial Testicular Cancer (FTC). The current report targets interest in clinical genetic testing for susceptibility to FTC. METHODS: Demographics, knowledge, health beliefs, and psychological and social factors were evaluated as covariates related to interest in genetic testing. RESULTS: The majority (66%) of 229 participants (64 affected men, 66 unaffected men, and 99 women) from 47 multiple-case FTC families expressed interest in having a genetic test within 6 months, should such a test become available. Interest was similar among the three subgroups mentioned above. Worries about insurance discrimination based on genetic test results were associated with a significantly lower interest in testing. Alternatively, participants were more likely to be interested in genetic testing if they were younger and had higher levels of family support, a physician's recommendation supporting testing, cancer distress, and a need for information to inform the health care of their children. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals social and relationship factors that FTC survivors and their relatives considered important when contemplating the use of new genetic technologies. This is the first study describing hypothetical interest in genetic testing for familial testicular cancer.
PURPOSE: This study is part of an ongoing National Cancer Institute multidisciplinary, etiologically-focused, cross-sectional study of Familial Testicular Cancer (FTC). The current report targets interest in clinical genetic testing for susceptibility to FTC. METHODS: Demographics, knowledge, health beliefs, and psychological and social factors were evaluated as covariates related to interest in genetic testing. RESULTS: The majority (66%) of 229 participants (64 affected men, 66 unaffected men, and 99 women) from 47 multiple-case FTC families expressed interest in having a genetic test within 6 months, should such a test become available. Interest was similar among the three subgroups mentioned above. Worries about insurance discrimination based on genetic test results were associated with a significantly lower interest in testing. Alternatively, participants were more likely to be interested in genetic testing if they were younger and had higher levels of family support, a physician's recommendation supporting testing, cancer distress, and a need for information to inform the health care of their children. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals social and relationship factors that FTC survivors and their relatives considered important when contemplating the use of new genetic technologies. This is the first study describing hypothetical interest in genetic testing for familial testicular cancer.
Authors: Christine M Mueller; Larissa Korde; Hormuzd A Katki; Philip S Rosenberg; June A Peters; Mark H Greene Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Susan T Vadaparampil; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Julie Dutil; Marieva Puig; Teri L Malo; Jessica McIntyre; Rossybelle Perales; Euna M August; Zuheily Closser Journal: J Community Genet Date: 2011-07-12
Authors: Mark H Greene; Christian P Kratz; Phuong L Mai; Christine Mueller; June A Peters; Gennady Bratslavsky; Alex Ling; Peter M Choyke; Ahalya Premkumar; Janet Bracci; Rissah J Watkins; Mary Lou McMaster; Larissa A Korde Journal: Endocr Relat Cancer Date: 2010-03-08 Impact factor: 5.678
Authors: June A Peters; Ellen B Beckjord; Deliya R Banda Ryan; Ann G Carr; Susan T Vadaparampil; Jennifer T Loud; Larissa Korde; Mark H Greene Journal: J Genet Couns Date: 2008-05-15 Impact factor: 2.537
Authors: Julie N Harris; Deborah J Bowen; Alan Kuniyuki; Laura McIntosh; Liesel M FitzGerald; Elaine A Ostrander; Janet L Stanford Journal: Genet Med Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 8.822