Literature DB >> 17171654

The CAPTURE registry: results of carotid stenting with embolic protection in the post approval setting.

William A Gray1, Jay S Yadav, Patrick Verta, Andrea Scicli, Ronald Fairman, Mark Wholey, L Nelson Hopkins, Richard Atkinson, Rod Raabe, Stanley Barnwell, Richard Green.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pivotal study data examining carotid stenting with embolic protection as a less invasive alternative to endarterectomy for high surgical risk patients have been acquired under controlled conditions with highly selected physicians and hospitals. This report examines outcomes of carotid stenting post-approval after diffusion of this technology to a broader cross-section of physicians and hospitals.
METHODS: The Carotid Acculink/Accunet Post-Approval Trial to Uncover Unanticipated or Rare Events (CAPTURE) is a prospective, multi-center registry to assess two important aspects of the post-IDE experience: the safety of carotid stenting by physicians with varying levels of experience as a measure of the adequacy of physician training, and the identification of rare/unexpected device-related complications. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, any stroke, or myocardial infarction within 30 days post-procedure.
RESULTS: 3,500 patients were enrolled by 353 physicians at 144 sites. The 30-day primary endpoint event rate was 6.3% (95% CI: 5.5-7.1%) and did not differ among the three operator experience levels (5.3%, 6.0%, and 7.4%; P = 0.31) from most to least experienced, respectively. There were no differences in outcomes among physician specialties when adjusted for case mix. There were no unanticipated device related adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the CAPTURE study compare favorably to those achieved in the predicate pivotal investigations, and suggest that the post-approval transfer of this new therapy to the community practice setting via carotid stent training programs is effective in preparing physicians with varying experience levels and specialty training backgrounds. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17171654     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.21050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  23 in total

Review 1.  Interventional management of asymptomatic extracranial carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Vincent V Truong; Alex Abou-Chebl
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  The role of endovascular expertise in carotid artery stenting: results from the ALKK-CAS-Registry in 5,535 patients.

Authors:  Stephan Staubach; Ralph Hein-Rothweiler; Matthias Hochadel; Manuela Segerer; Ralf Zahn; Jens Jung; Gotthard Riess; Hubert Seggewiss; Andre Schneider; Thomas Fürste; Christian Gottkehaskamp; Harald Mudra
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 3.  Carotid endarterectomy versus angioplasty/stenting for carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Kevin M Barrett; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 4.  Clinical significance and technical assessment of stent cell geometry in carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Gail M Siewiorek; Ender A Finol; Mark H Wholey
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.487

Review 5.  Current status of carotid artery angioplasty and stent placement: impact of recent clinical studies.

Authors:  Gustavo J Rodriguez; Adnan I Qureshi
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.081

6.  Age and outcomes after carotid stenting and endarterectomy: the carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial.

Authors:  Jenifer H Voeks; George Howard; Gary S Roubin; Mahmoud B Malas; David J Cohen; W Charles Sternbergh; Herbert D Aronow; Mark K Eskandari; Alice J Sheffet; Brajesh K Lal; James F Meschia; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy.

Authors:  Kate C Young; Robert G Holloway; W Scott Burgin; Curtis G Benesch
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.136

8.  Clinical Outcome of Carotid Artery Stenting According to Provider Specialty and Volume.

Authors:  Ali F AbuRahma; John E Campbell; Nizar Hariri; Joseph AbuRahma; L Scott Dean; Mark C Bates; Aravinda Nanjundappa; Patrick A Stone; Ace O'vil
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 1.466

9.  Stroke prevention: carotid stenting versus carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Christopher J White
Journal:  F1000 Med Rep       Date:  2010-03-25

Review 10.  Percutaneous versus surgical revascularization for symptomatic carotid artery disease.

Authors:  Pareena Bilkoo; Debabrata Mukherjee
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.