BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Research on young drivers directly linking risk factors to serious injury and death outcomes is required. The DRIVE Study was established to facilitate this aim. This paper outlines the study methods and describes the population that has been recruited, in order to demonstrate that the necessary heterogeneity in risk factors has been attained. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Drivers aged 17-24 years holding their first-stage provisional driver's licence from New South Wales, Australia, were recruited into a prospective cohort study. The participants were contacted by mail and asked to complete the study questionnaire at an online site or via a mailed questionnaire. Baseline data collection involved a questionnaire with questions to drivers about their training, risk perception, driver behavior, sensation-seeking behavior and mental health. Participants gave consent for prospective data linkage to their data on licensing, crashes and injuries, held in routinely collected databases. RESULTS: 20 822 drivers completed the baseline questionnaire, of whom 45.4% were men, 74.3% resided in capital cities and 25.7% in regional or remote areas. The recruited study population showed a wide variation in the risk factors under examination. For example, almost 40% of drivers reported drinking alcohol at hazardous levels and about 32% of participants seemed to be at a high or very high risk of psychological distress. Participants reported a mean of 67.3 h (median 60 h) of supervised driver training while holding their learner's permit. CONCLUSIONS: The DRIVE Study has a robust study design aimed at minimizing bias in the collection of outcome data. Analyses of baseline data showed substantial heterogeneity of risk factors in the study population. Subsequent prospective linkages comparing relative differences in exposures at baseline with the outcomes of interest have the potential to provide important new information needed to develop targeted interventions aimed at young drivers.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Research on young drivers directly linking risk factors to serious injury and death outcomes is required. The DRIVE Study was established to facilitate this aim. This paper outlines the study methods and describes the population that has been recruited, in order to demonstrate that the necessary heterogeneity in risk factors has been attained. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Drivers aged 17-24 years holding their first-stage provisional driver's licence from New South Wales, Australia, were recruited into a prospective cohort study. The participants were contacted by mail and asked to complete the study questionnaire at an online site or via a mailed questionnaire. Baseline data collection involved a questionnaire with questions to drivers about their training, risk perception, driver behavior, sensation-seeking behavior and mental health. Participants gave consent for prospective data linkage to their data on licensing, crashes and injuries, held in routinely collected databases. RESULTS: 20 822 drivers completed the baseline questionnaire, of whom 45.4% were men, 74.3% resided in capital cities and 25.7% in regional or remote areas. The recruited study population showed a wide variation in the risk factors under examination. For example, almost 40% of drivers reported drinking alcohol at hazardous levels and about 32% of participants seemed to be at a high or very high risk of psychological distress. Participants reported a mean of 67.3 h (median 60 h) of supervised driver training while holding their learner's permit. CONCLUSIONS: The DRIVE Study has a robust study design aimed at minimizing bias in the collection of outcome data. Analyses of baseline data showed substantial heterogeneity of risk factors in the study population. Subsequent prospective linkages comparing relative differences in exposures at baseline with the outcomes of interest have the potential to provide important new information needed to develop targeted interventions aimed at young drivers.
Authors: M G Sawyer; F M Arney; P A Baghurst; J J Clark; B W Graetz; R J Kosky; B Nurcombe; G C Patton; M R Prior; B Raphael; J M Rey; L C Whaites; S R Zubrick Journal: Aust N Z J Psychiatry Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 5.744
Authors: S N Ameratunga; R N Norton; G Whitlock; S Macmahon; C Coggan; R T Jackson; J D Langley; V Parag; D Smith; D G Woodfield Journal: Inj Prev Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 2.399
Authors: R C Kessler; G Andrews; L J Colpe; E Hiripi; D K Mroczek; S L T Normand; E E Walters; A M Zaslavsky Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Rebecca Ivers; Teresa Senserrick; Soufiane Boufous; Mark Stevenson; Huei-Yang Chen; Mark Woodward; Robyn Norton Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2009-07-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Alexandra L C Martiniuk; Rebecca Q Ivers; Nick Glozier; George C Patton; Lawrence T Lam; Soufiane Boufous; Teresa Senserrick; Ann Williamson; Mark Stevenson; Robyn Norton Journal: CMAJ Date: 2009-11-16 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Roberta Siliquini; Simone Chiadò Piat; Francisco Alonso; Axel Druart; Marcin Kedzia; Antonio Mollica; Valeria Siliquini; Daniel Vankov; Anita Villerusa; Lamberto Manzoli Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-04-26 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: B Taylor; H M Irving; F Kanteres; R Room; G Borges; C Cherpitel; T Greenfield; J Rehm Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2010-03-16 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Nicholas Glozier; Alexandra Martiniuk; George Patton; Rebecca Ivers; Qiang Li; Ian Hickie; Teresa Senserrick; Mark Woodward; Robyn Norton; Mark Stevenson Journal: Sleep Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 5.849