Literature DB >> 17169365

A survey of formal methods for determining functional joint axes.

Rainald M Ehrig1, William R Taylor, Georg N Duda, Markus O Heller.   

Abstract

Axes of rotation e.g. at the knee, are often generated from clinical gait analysis data to be used in the assessment of kinematic abnormalities, the diagnosis of disease, or the ongoing monitoring of a patient's condition. They are additionally used in musculoskeletal models to aid in the description of joint and segment kinematics for patient specific analyses. Currently available methods to describe joint axes from segment marker positions share the problem that when one segment is transformed into the coordinate system of another, artefacts associated with motion of the markers relative to the bone can become magnified. In an attempt to address this problem, a symmetrical axis of rotation approach (SARA) is presented here to determine a unique axis of rotation that can consider the movement of two dynamic body segments simultaneously, and then compared its performance in a survey against a number of previously proposed techniques. Using a generated virtual joint, with superimposed marker error conditions to represent skin movement artefacts, fitting methods (geometric axis fit, cylinder axis fit, algebraic axis fit) and transformation techniques (axis transformation technique, mean helical axis, Schwartz approach) were classified and compared with the SARA. Nearly all approaches were able to estimate the axis of rotation to within an RMS error of 0.1cm at large ranges of motion (90 degrees ). Although the geometric axis fit produced the least RMS error of approximately 1.2 cm at lower ranges of motion (5 degrees ) with a stationary axis, the SARA and Axis Transformation Technique outperformed all other approaches under the most demanding marker artefact conditions for all ranges of motion. The cylinder and algebraic axis fit approaches were unable to compute competitive AoR estimates. Whilst these initial results using the SARA are promising and are fast enough to be determined "on-line", the technique must now be proven in a clinical environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17169365     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.10.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  40 in total

1.  Changes in the orientation of knee functional flexion axis during passive flexion and extension movements in navigated total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Francesca Colle; Danilo Bruni; Francesco Iacono; Andrea Visani; Stefano Zaffagnini; Maurilio Marcacci; Nicola Lopomo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Knee functional flexion axis in osteoarthritic patients: comparison in vivo with transepicondylar axis using a navigation system.

Authors:  F Colle; S Bignozzi; N Lopomo; S Zaffagnini; L Sun; M Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Analysis of knee functional flexion axis in navigated TKA: identification and repeatability before and after implant positioning.

Authors:  Francesca Colle; Nicola Lopomo; Danilo Bruni; Andrea Visani; Francesco Iacono; Stefano Zaffagnini; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-24       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Is my model good enough? Best practices for verification and validation of musculoskeletal models and simulations of movement.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hicks; Thomas K Uchida; Ajay Seth; Apoorva Rajagopal; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Global sensitivity analysis of the joint kinematics during gait to the parameters of a lower limb multi-body model.

Authors:  Aimad El Habachi; Florent Moissenet; Sonia Duprey; Laurence Cheze; Raphaël Dumas
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Modifications of femoral component design in multi-radius total knee arthroplasty lead to higher lateral posterior femoro-tibial translation.

Authors:  Tilman Pfitzner; Philippe Moewis; Patrick Stein; Heide Boeth; Adam Trepczynski; Philipp von Roth; Georg N Duda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Kinematic description of soft tissue artifacts: quantifying rigid versus deformation components and their relation with bone motion.

Authors:  Helios de Rosario; Alvaro Page; Antonio Besa; Vicente Mata; Efraim Conejero
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Hip joint center localisation: A biomechanical application to hip arthroplasty population.

Authors:  Vicky Bouffard; Mickael Begon; Annick Champagne; Payam Farhadnia; Pascal-André Vendittoli; Martin Lavigne; François Prince
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2012-08-18

9.  An X-ray-free method to accurately identify the elbow flexion-extension axis for the placement of a hinged external fixator.

Authors:  Jian Song; Hui Ding; Wei Han; Junqiang Wang; Guangzhi Wang
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 2.924

10.  Electromyography-Driven Forward Dynamics Simulation to Estimate In Vivo Joint Contact Forces During Normal, Smooth, and Bouncy Gaits.

Authors:  Swithin S Razu; Trent M Guess
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 2.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.