Literature DB >> 17167797

Confidentiality versus duty to inform--an empirical study on attitudes towards the handling of genetic information.

Katharina Wolff1, Wibecke Brun, Gerd Kvale, Karin Nordin.   

Abstract

We set out to investigate whether potential relatives want to be informed about the existence of hereditary conditions within their family and under which conditions they want healthcare providers to breach confidentiality to inform them. We hypothesized that the willingness to be informed about a hereditary condition in the family would be influenced by characteristics of the disease and by individual characteristics. Surveys were administered to a Norwegian random sample (N = 2,400) to a Swedish random sample (N = 1,200), and to a Norwegian student sample (n = 607). Eight different disease scenarios were constructed, systematically varying three disease characteristics: fatality, penetrance, and availability of treatment. Results show that a majority of participants wished to be informed about the existence of a hereditary disease within their family. The desire to be informed and the acceptability of breaches of confidentiality were predicted by the treatability of the disease, uncertainty avoidance, and age, but not by self-efficacy or worry. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17167797     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  7 in total

1.  Unsolicited information letters to increase awareness of Lynch syndrome and familial colorectal cancer: reactions and attitudes.

Authors:  Helle Vendel Petersen; Birgitte Lidegaard Frederiksen; Charlotte Kvist Lautrup; Lars Joachim Lindberg; Steen Ladelund; Mef Nilbert
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  The risks of absolute medical confidentiality.

Authors:  M A Crook
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Swedish University Students' Opinion Regarding Information About Soft Markers.

Authors:  Afsaneh Hayat Roshanai; Peter Lindgren; Karin Nordin; Charlotta Ingvoldstad
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  Health-care professionals' responsibility to patients' relatives in genetic medicine: a systematic review and synthesis of empirical research.

Authors:  Sandi Dheensa; Angela Fenwick; Shiri Shkedi-Rafid; Gillian Crawford; Anneke Lucassen
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 8.822

5.  Public support for healthcare-mediated disclosure of hereditary cancer risk information: Results from a population-based survey in Sweden.

Authors:  Andreas Andersson; Carolina Hawranek; Anna Öfverholm; Hans Ehrencrona; Kalle Grill; Senada Hajdarevic; Beatrice Melin; Emma Tham; Barbro Numan Hellquist; Anna Rosén
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 2.857

6.  Healthcare professionals' responsibility for informing relatives at risk of hereditary disease.

Authors:  Kalle Grill; Anna Rosén
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Attitudes towards the sharing of genetic information with at-risk relatives: results of a quantitative survey.

Authors:  Timothy J Heaton; Victoria Chico
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.132

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.