PURPOSE: Although lymph node metastasis via lymphatic vessels often is related with an adverse outcome, it is not well known whether lymphatic spread to lymph node needs the development of the new lymphatic formation. In addition, the correlation between lymphangiogenesis and prognosis has not been well documented. This study was designed to assess the prognostic value of lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic vessel invasion in colorectal cancer. METHODS: We examined 106 colorectal cancer specimens by immunostaining for podoplanin, lymphatic endothelial specific marker. We evaluated lymphangiogenesis, as measured by lymphatic microvessel density, and lymphatic vessel invasion. We next investigated the association of these two parameters with the clinicopathologic findings and prognosis. RESULTS: A significant correlation was observed between high lymphatic microvessel density and positive lymphatic vessel invasion (P = 0.0003). Positive lymphatic vessel invasion was significantly associated with the presence of lymph node metastasis (P = 0.0071). The survival curves demonstrated that both high lymphatic microvessel density and positive lymphatic vessel invasion were correlated with an adverse outcome (P = 0.0004 and P = 0.009, respectively). In a univariate analysis, high lymphatic microvessel density and positive lymphatic vessel invasion were negatively associated with the overall survival (P = 0.0011 and P = 0.0118, respectively). Furthermore, high lymphatic microvessel density, but not lymphatic vessel invasion, correlated with a poor outcome in a multivariate analysis (P = 0.0114). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggested that lymphatic vessel invasion was related with lymph node metastasis and that both lymphatic microvessel density and lymphatic vessel invasion were related with an adverse outcome in colorectal cancer. Furthermore, lymphatic microvessel density may be a useful prognostic factor in colorectal cancer.
PURPOSE: Although lymph node metastasis via lymphatic vessels often is related with an adverse outcome, it is not well known whether lymphatic spread to lymph node needs the development of the new lymphatic formation. In addition, the correlation between lymphangiogenesis and prognosis has not been well documented. This study was designed to assess the prognostic value of lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic vessel invasion in colorectal cancer. METHODS: We examined 106 colorectal cancer specimens by immunostaining for podoplanin, lymphatic endothelial specific marker. We evaluated lymphangiogenesis, as measured by lymphatic microvessel density, and lymphatic vessel invasion. We next investigated the association of these two parameters with the clinicopathologic findings and prognosis. RESULTS: A significant correlation was observed between high lymphatic microvessel density and positive lymphatic vessel invasion (P = 0.0003). Positive lymphatic vessel invasion was significantly associated with the presence of lymph node metastasis (P = 0.0071). The survival curves demonstrated that both high lymphatic microvessel density and positive lymphatic vessel invasion were correlated with an adverse outcome (P = 0.0004 and P = 0.009, respectively). In a univariate analysis, high lymphatic microvessel density and positive lymphatic vessel invasion were negatively associated with the overall survival (P = 0.0011 and P = 0.0118, respectively). Furthermore, high lymphatic microvessel density, but not lymphatic vessel invasion, correlated with a poor outcome in a multivariate analysis (P = 0.0114). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggested that lymphatic vessel invasion was related with lymph node metastasis and that both lymphatic microvessel density and lymphatic vessel invasion were related with an adverse outcome in colorectal cancer. Furthermore, lymphatic microvessel density may be a useful prognostic factor in colorectal cancer.
Authors: Trustin S Domes; Patrick H D Colquhoun; Brian Taylor; Jonathan I Izawa; Andrew A House; Patrick P W Luke; Jonathan I Izawa Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Steven A Stacker; Steven P Williams; Tara Karnezis; Ramin Shayan; Stephen B Fox; Marc G Achen Journal: Nat Rev Cancer Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 60.716
Authors: Luciana Regina Moreira; André Almeida Schenka; Paulo Latuf-Filho; André Lisboa Penná; Carmen S P Lima; Fernando Augusto Soares; Miriam Aparecida Silva Trevisan; José Vassallo Journal: Tumour Biol Date: 2011-01-08
Authors: P Chiranjeevi; K Mrudula Spurthi; N Santhoshi Rani; G Rajesh Kumar; T Mohini Aiyengar; M Saraswati; G Srilatha; G Kishore Kumar; Sudha Sinha; C Sanjeeva Kumari; B Nagarjuna Reddy; S Vishnupriya; H Surekha Rani Journal: Tumour Biol Date: 2013-12-20
Authors: Michele McElroy; Katsuhiro Hayashi; Barbara Garmy-Susini; Sharmeela Kaushal; Judith A Varner; A R Moossa; Robert M Hoffman; Michael Bouvet Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2008-01-18 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Fania S Doekhie; Hans Morreau; Geertruida H de Bock; Frank M Speetjens; N Geeske Dekker-Ensink; Hein Putter; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Peter J K Kuppen Journal: Cancer Microenviron Date: 2008-08-06