Literature DB >> 17164271

Genomic instability and the role of radiation quality.

M A Kadhim1, M A Hill, S R Moore.   

Abstract

Genomic instability (GI) is a hallmark of tumorigenic progression and is observed as delayed genetic damage in the progeny of irradiated and unirradiated bystander cells. The expression of GI can be influenced by genotype, cell type and radiation quality. While several studies have demonstrated the induction of GI by high and low-linear energy transfer (LET) radiation, our work on human and mouse primary cell systems has shown LET-dependent differences in the induction and expression of GI. These differences might be attributed to differences in radiation track structure, dose rate, contribution of bystander cells and radiation dose. This paper reviews the role of radiation quality in the induction of GI and describe the possible mechanisms underlining the observed differences between radiation types on its induction. The experimental results presented suggest that dose might be the most significant factor in determining induction of GI after low-LET radiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17164271     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncl445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  11 in total

Review 1.  Systems biology and its potential role in radiobiology.

Authors:  Ludwig Feinendegen; Philip Hahnfeldt; Eric E Schadt; Michael Stumpf; Eberhard O Voit
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data.

Authors:  Maurice Tubiana; Ludwig E Feinendegen; Chichuan Yang; Joseph M Kaminski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Hemopoietic response to low dose-rates of ionizing radiation shows stem cell tolerance and adaptation.

Authors:  Theodor M Fliedner; Dieter H Graessle; Viktor Meineke; Ludwig E Feinendegen
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Low-dose cancer risk modeling must recognize up-regulation of protection.

Authors:  Ludwig E Feinendegen; Myron Pollycove; Ronald D Neumann
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 5.  Crosstalk between telomere maintenance and radiation effects: A key player in the process of radiation-induced carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Grace Shim; Michelle Ricoul; William M Hempel; Edouard I Azzam; Laure Sabatier
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 5.657

Review 6.  Targeted delivery of radioprotective agents to mitochondria.

Authors:  Irina Zabbarova; Anthony Kanai
Journal:  Mol Interv       Date:  2008-12

7.  Irradiated human endothelial progenitor cells induce bystander killing in human non-small cell lung and pancreatic cancer cells.

Authors:  William T Turchan; Ronald H Shapiro; Garrett V Sevigny; Helen Chin-Sinex; Benjamin Pruden; Marc S Mendonca
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 2.694

8.  Opposite roles for p38MAPK-driven responses and reactive oxygen species in the persistence and resolution of radiation-induced genomic instability.

Authors:  Erica Werner; Huichen Wang; Paul W Doetsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Bystander autophagy mediated by radiation-induced exosomal miR-7-5p in non-targeted human bronchial epithelial cells.

Authors:  Man Song; Yu Wang; Zeng-Fu Shang; Xiao-Dan Liu; Da-Fei Xie; Qi Wang; Hua Guan; Ping-Kun Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Radiation-Induced Senescence Bystander Effect: The Role of Exosomes.

Authors:  Eman Elbakrawy; Savneet Kaur Bains; Scott Bright; Raheem Al-Abedi; Ammar Mayah; Edwin Goodwin; Munira Kadhim
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.