Literature DB >> 17163907

Expression of mercuric ion reductase in Eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides) confers mercuric ion reduction and resistance.

Dongsheng Che1, Richard B Meagher, Andrew C P Heaton, Amparo Lima, Clayton L Rugh, Scott A Merkle.   

Abstract

Mercury is one of the most hazardous heavy metals and is a particular problem in aquatic ecosystems, where organic mercury is biomagnified in the food chain. Previous studies demonstrated that transgenic model plants expressing a modified mercuric ion reductase gene from bacteria could detoxify mercury by converting the more toxic and reductive ionic form [Hg(II)] to less toxic elemental mercury [Hg(0)]. To further investigate if a genetic engineering approach for mercury phytoremediation can be effective in trees with a greater potential in riparian ecosystems, we generated transgenic Eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides) trees expressing modified merA9 and merA18 genes. Leaf sections from transgenic plantlets produced adventitious shoots in the presence of 50 microm Hg(II) supplied as HgCl2, which inhibited shoot induction from leaf explants of wild-type plantlets. Transgenic shoots cultured in a medium containing 25 microm Hg(II) showed normal growth and rooted, while wild-type shoots were killed. When the transgenic cottonwood plantlets were exposed to Hg(II), they evolved 2-4-fold the amount of Hg(0) relative to wild-type plantlets. Transgenic merA9 and merA18 plants accumulated significantly higher biomass than control plants on a Georgia Piedmont soil contaminated with 40 p.p.m. Hg(II). Our results indicate that Eastern cottonwood plants expressing the bacterial mercuric ion reductase gene have potential as candidates for in situ remediation of mercury-contaminated soils or wastewater.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 17163907     DOI: 10.1046/j.1467-7652.2003.00031.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J        ISSN: 1467-7644            Impact factor:   9.803


  12 in total

Review 1.  Perspectives for genetic engineering of poplars for enhanced phytoremediation abilities.

Authors:  Rakesh Yadav; Pooja Arora; Sandeep Kumar; Ashok Chaudhury
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Effect of genetically modified poplars on soil microbial communities during the phytoremediation of waste mine tailings.

Authors:  Moonsuk Hur; Yongho Kim; Hae-Ryong Song; Jong Min Kim; Young Im Choi; Hana Yi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Strategies for the engineered phytoremediation of toxic element pollution: mercury and arsenic.

Authors:  Richard B Meagher; Andrew C P Heaton
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2005-07-02       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 4.  In situ remediation technologies for mercury-contaminated soil.

Authors:  Feng He; Jie Gao; Eric Pierce; P J Strong; Hailong Wang; Liyuan Liang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Mercury concentration in lichen, moss and soil samples collected from the forest areas of Praded and Glacensis Euroregions (Poland and Czech Republic).

Authors:  Andrzej Kłos; Małgorzata Rajfur; Ivo Šrámek; Maria Wacławek
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Exploring the metal phytoremediation potential of three Populus alba L. clones using an in vitro screening.

Authors:  Sara Di Lonardo; Maurizio Capuana; Miluscia Arnetoli; Roberto Gabbrielli; Cristina Gonnelli
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 7.  Genetic engineering to enhance mercury phytoremediation.

Authors:  Oscar N Ruiz; Henry Daniell
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 9.740

Review 8.  Potential Biotechnological Strategies for the Cleanup of Heavy Metals and Metalloids.

Authors:  Kareem A Mosa; Ismail Saadoun; Kundan Kumar; Mohamed Helmy; Om Parkash Dhankher
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 9.  Phytoextraction of Heavy Metals: A Promising Tool for Clean-Up of Polluted Environment?

Authors:  Jachym Suman; Ondrej Uhlik; Jitka Viktorova; Tomas Macek
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 10.  Phytoremediation and Microorganisms-Assisted Phytoremediation of Mercury-Contaminated Soils: Challenges and Perspectives.

Authors:  Emanuela D Tiodar; Cristina L Văcar; Dorina Podar
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.