Literature DB >> 17162168

Midterm results of Metasul metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.

Shu Saito1, Junnosuke Ryu, Masahiko Watanabe, Takao Ishii, Kaichiro Saigo.   

Abstract

We assessed 106 total hip arthroplasties performed with a new metal-on-metal hip system; the patients were monitored for at least 5 years. The average Harris Hip Score of the patients was 39.5 points before surgery and 87.8 points at final follow-up evaluation. Radiographically, the acetabular component was stable in 103 hips and possibly unstable in 3 hips. The femoral component was bone ingrown in 97 hips and stable and fibrous in 9. After surgery, 6 hips dislocated. The polyethylene liner dissociated in one patient. No patient exhibited clear signs of loosening, migration, or osteolysis. Distal femoral cortical hypertrophy was seen in 35.8% of the cases. Survival at the mean follow-up point (6.4 years) was 99.1%. There was no significant difference in serum chromium concentration between metal-on-metal bearings and polyethylene-on-metal bearings (control subjects). This study found that metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty produces excellent midterm results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17162168     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.11.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  9 in total

Review 1.  Survival of hard-on-hard bearings in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael G Zywiel; Siraj A Sayeed; Aaron J Johnson; Thomas P Schmalzried; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Cemented metal-on-metal total hip replacement with 28-mm head: prospective, long-term, clinical, radiological and metal ions data.

Authors:  Ibrahim A Malek; Sheethal Prasad Patange Subba Rao; Narendra Kumar Rath; U N Mallya
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-12-19

3.  Grading the severity of soft tissue changes associated with metal-on-metal hip replacements: reliability of an MR grading system.

Authors:  Helen Anderson; Andoni Paul Toms; John G Cahir; Richard W Goodwin; James Wimhurst; John F Nolan
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-07-25       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  A retrospective comparative study of mortality and causes of death among patients with metal-on-metal and metal-on-polyethylene total hip prostheses in primary osteoarthritis after a long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Tuomo Visuri; Håkan Borg; Pekka Pulkkinen; Pekka Paavolainen; Eero Pukkala
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty does equally well in osteonecrosis and osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Manish R Dastane; William T Long; Zhinian Wan; Lisa Chao; Lawrence D Dorr
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  How have alternative bearings and modularity affected revision rates in total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  William M Mihalko; Markus A Wimmer; Carol A Pacione; Michel P Laurent; Robert F Murphy; Carson Rider
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Deformation of the Durom acetabular component and its impact on tribology in a cadaveric model--a simulator study.

Authors:  Feng Liu; Zhefeng Chen; Yanqing Gu; Qing Wang; Weiding Cui; Weimin Fan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Long-term results of the M2A-38-mm metal-on-metal articulation.

Authors:  Carlo Trevisan; Stefano Piscitello; Raymond Klumpp; Tonino Mascitti
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2018-12-07

9.  Outcome and serum ion determination up to 11 years after implantation of a cemented metal-on-metal hip prosthesis.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Lazennec; Patrick Boyer; Joel Poupon; Marc-Antoine Rousseau; Carine Roy; Philippe Ravaud; Yves Catonné
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.717

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.