Literature DB >> 17161969

Ambulatory methods for recording cough.

Jaclyn Smith1.   

Abstract

Recording cough sounds to objectively quantify coughing was first performed using large reel-to-reel tape recorders more than 40 years ago. Coughs were counted manually, which is an extremely laborious and time-consuming process. Current technologies including digital recording techniques, data compression and improvements in digital storage capacity should make the process of recording and counting coughs suitable for automation; however, to date no accurate, objective cough monitoring device is available. Cough sounds are easily distinguishable from other vocalizations by the human ear and hence it is reasonable to assume that coughs sounds should have characteristic, identifying acoustic properties. However, the acoustic features of spontaneously occurring cough sounds are extremely variable. Furthermore, in even the worst cases of cough, the time spent speaking is an order of magnitude greater than the time spent coughing. It follows that even an algorithm that mistakes only a very small proportion of speech as cough will still have an unacceptable false positive rate. There is a clear need for an objective measure of cough for use in clinical practice, clinical research and trials of novel treatments. In the near future automated ambulatory systems with sufficient accuracy to be of clinical use should be available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17161969     DOI: 10.1016/j.pupt.2006.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pulm Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 1094-5539            Impact factor:   3.410


  9 in total

Review 1.  New developments in the objective assessment of cough.

Authors:  Jaclyn Smith; Ashley Woodcock
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2007-12-09       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 2.  Before we get started: what is a cough?

Authors:  Giovanni A Fontana
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 2.584

3.  A portable automatic cough analyser in the ambulatory assessment of cough.

Authors:  Malgorzata Krajnik; Iwona Damps-Konstanska; Lucyna Gorska; Ewa Jassem
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 4.  GERD-related cough: pathophysiology and diagnostic approach.

Authors:  Jaclyn A Smith; Rayid Abdulqawi; Lesley A Houghton
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2011-06

5.  Semantics and types of cough.

Authors:  Kian Fan Chung; Don Bolser; Paul Davenport; Giovanni Fontana; Alyn Morice; John Widdicombe
Journal:  Pulm Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 3.410

6.  Automated Cough Assessment on a Mobile Platform.

Authors:  Mark Sterling; Hyekyun Rhee; Mark Bocko
Journal:  J Med Eng       Date:  2014

Review 7.  An update and systematic review on drug therapies for the treatment of refractory chronic cough.

Authors:  Nicole M Ryan; Anne E Vertigan; Surinder S Birring
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.889

Review 8.  Past and Trends in Cough Sound Acquisition, Automatic Detection and Automatic Classification: A Comparative Review.

Authors:  Antoine Serrurier; Christiane Neuschaefer-Rube; Rainer Röhrig
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-10       Impact factor: 3.847

9.  Validation of an automated cough detection algorithm for tracking recovery of pulmonary tuberculosis patients.

Authors:  Sandra Larson; Germán Comina; Robert H Gilman; Brian H Tracey; Marjory Bravard; José W López
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.