Literature DB >> 20721977

The 2D:4D digit ratio is not a useful marker for prenatal famine exposure: Evidence from the Dutch hunger winter families study.

Aryeh D Stein1, Henry S Kahn, L H Lumey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Digit lengths, and in particular the ratio of the 2nd (2D) to 4th (4D) digit (2D:4D), are stable in adulthood and have been linked to characteristics thought to have developmental origins, but little research has focused on early life determinants of these measures. We examined whether exposure to acute famine during specific periods of gestation was associated with 2D, 4D or the 2D:4D ratio.
METHODS: We studied men and women (1) born in one of three hospitals in western Netherlands whose mothers were exposed to a limited period of famine immediately prior to or during the pregnancy (n = 337); (2) born in the same hospitals to mothers not exposed to famine during the pregnancy (n = 271) or same-sex siblings of individuals in Groups 1 and 2 (n = 295). We measured 2D and 4D on both hands using calipers and computed the 2D:4D ratio.
RESULTS: Mean 2D and 4D lengths were 73.5 (SD 5.1) and 75.0 (5.4) mm, respectively. The 2D:4D ratio was 0.981 (SD 0.030). Both 2D and 4D were associated with male gender and height (all P < 0.001), and weakly with BMI. The 2D:4D ratio was 0.0070 (95% confidence interval 0.0017, 0.0123) lower among males as compared with females, and was not significantly associated with height (0.0002 per cm; 95% -0.0001, 0.0005). The 2D:4D ratio was not significantly associated with exposure to famine, overall (-0.0010, 95% CI 0.0030, 0.0050) or within any period of gestation.
CONCLUSIONS: The 2D:4D ratio is not significantly affected by prenatal exposure to famine and therefore is not a useful marker for generalized prenatal undernutrition.
© 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20721977      PMCID: PMC2957542          DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.21085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Biol        ISSN: 1042-0533            Impact factor:   1.937


  33 in total

1.  A longitudinal study of digit ratio (2D:4D) and other finger ratios in Jamaican children.

Authors:  Robert Trivers; John Manning; Amy Jacobson
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 3.587

2.  Early prenatal attainment of adult metacarpal-phalangeal rankings and proportions.

Authors:  S M Garn; A R Burdi; W J Babler; S Stinson
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 2.868

3.  Cohort profile: the Dutch Hunger Winter families study.

Authors:  L H Lumey; Aryeh D Stein; Henry S Kahn; Karin M van der Pal-de Bruin; G J Blauw; Patricia A Zybert; Ezra S Susser
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-06-25       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Second-to-fourth digit ratio predicts success among high-frequency financial traders.

Authors:  John M Coates; Mark Gurnell; Aldo Rustichini
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Digit ratio (2D:4D) and hand preference for writing in the BBC Internet Study.

Authors:  J T Manning; M Peters
Journal:  Laterality       Date:  2009-01-28

6.  Scientometric analysis and bibliography of digit ratio (2D:4D) research, 1998-2008.

Authors:  Martin Voracek; Lisa Mariella Loibl
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  2009-06

7.  A fingerprint characteristic associated with the early prenatal environment.

Authors:  Henry S Kahn; Mariaelisa Graff; Aryeh D Stein; Patricia A Zybert; Ian W McKeague; L H Lumey
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.937

8.  Obesity in young men after famine exposure in utero and early infancy.

Authors:  G P Ravelli; Z A Stein; M W Susser
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1976-08-12       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Famine, third-trimester pregnancy weight gain, and intrauterine growth: the Dutch Famine Birth Cohort Study.

Authors:  A D Stein; A C Ravelli; L H Lumey
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 0.553

10.  Sexual orientation and fluctuating asymmetry in men and women.

Authors:  Patricia A Hall; Catherine M Schaeff
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2008-02
View more
  3 in total

1.  2D:4D digit ratio is not a biomarker of developmental programming in baboons (Papio hamadryas species).

Authors:  Hillary F Huber; Cun Li; Peter W Nathanielsz
Journal:  J Med Primatol       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 0.667

2.  The left hand second to fourth digit ratio (2D:4D) does not discriminate world-class female gymnasts from age matched sedentary girls.

Authors:  Maarten W Peeters; Albrecht L Claessens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Hand Pattern Based on Second-to-Fourth Digit Ratio: Its Relationship to Sex, Body Mass Index, and Physical Activity.

Authors:  Noha M Al-Qattan; Sara K Al-Kharashi; Ghada K Al-Hindi; Nada M Dammas; Abdullah E Kattan; Mohammad M Al-Qattan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-05-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.