Literature DB >> 17160976

Studies of human physique and sexual attractiveness: sexual preferences of men and women in China.

Barnaby J Dixson1, Alan F Dixson, Baoguo Li, M J Anderson.   

Abstract

Men and women at Northwest University (n = 631), Xi'an, China, were asked to rate the attractiveness of male or female figures manipulated to vary somatotype, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), secondary sexual traits, and other features. In study 1, women rated the average masculine somatotype as most attractive, followed by the mesomorphic (muscular), ectomorphic (slim), and endomorphic (heavily built) somatotypes, in descending order of preference. In study 2, the amount and distribution of masculine trunk (chest and abdominal) hair were altered progressively in a series of front-posed figures. Women rated figures with no or little trunk hair as most attractive. Study 3 assessed the attractiveness of front-posed male figures which varied only in length of their nonerect penis. Numerical ratings for this trait were low, but moderate lengthening of the penis (22% or 33% above average) resulted in a significant increase in scores for attractiveness. In study 4, Chinese men rated the attractiveness of back-posed female images varying in waist-to-hip ratio (WHR from 0.5-1.0). The 0.6 WHR figure was most preferred, followed by 0.7, while figures with higher ratios (0.9 or 1.0) were significantly less attractive. Study 5 rated the attractiveness of female skin color: men expressed a marked preference for images which were lighter in color, as compared to images of average or darker skin colors. These results, the first of their kind reported for a Chinese population, support the view that sexual selection has influenced the evolution of human physique and sexual attractiveness in men and women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17160976     DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.20584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Biol        ISSN: 1042-0533            Impact factor:   1.937


  13 in total

1.  Electrophysiological evidence of perceived sexual attractiveness for human female bodies varying in waist-to-hip ratio.

Authors:  Marzia Del Zotto; Alan J Pegna
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Developmental Idealism, Body Weight and Shape, and Marriage Entry in Transitional China.

Authors:  Hongwei Xu
Journal:  Chin J Sociol       Date:  2016-04

3.  The Interacting Effects of Height and Shoulder-to-Hip Ratio on Perceptions of Attractiveness, Masculinity, and Fighting Ability: Experimental Design and Ecological Validity Considerations.

Authors:  Farid Pazhoohi; Ray Garza; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2022-09-08

4.  Safe Carrying of Heavy Infants Together With Hair Properties Explain Human Evolution.

Authors:  Lia Queiroz do Amaral
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-31

5.  Penis size interacts with body shape and height to influence male attractiveness.

Authors:  Brian S Mautz; Bob B M Wong; Richard A Peters; Michael D Jennions
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  An Evolutionary Perspective on Appearance Enhancement Behavior.

Authors:  Adam C Davis; Steven Arnocky
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-10-06

7.  Mental state attribution and body configuration in women.

Authors:  Jennifer A Bremser; Gordon G Gallup
Journal:  Front Evol Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-30

8.  Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Human Appearance Enhancements.

Authors:  Barnaby J W Dixson
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-03-15

9.  Women's Preferences for Penis Size: A New Research Method Using Selection among 3D Models.

Authors:  Nicole Prause; Jaymie Park; Shannon Leung; Geoffrey Miller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The relationship of female physical attractiveness to body fatness.

Authors:  Guanlin Wang; Kurosh Djafarian; Chima A Egedigwe; Asmaa El Hamdouchi; Robert Ojiambo; Harris Ramuth; Sandra Johanna Wallner-Liebmann; Sonja Lackner; Adama Diouf; Justina Sauciuvenaite; Catherine Hambly; Lobke M Vaanholt; Mark D Faries; John R Speakman
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.