Literature DB >> 17160397

[Development of a questionnaire for patient self-assessment of shoulder function based on the Rowe score].

A Kupsch1, M A Kessler, M Weis, A Imhoff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A questionnaire for patient self-assessment of shoulder function was designed. It was based on the internationally accepted Rowe score.
METHOD: Explanations and photographs were added to the various parameters to make them easier to understand for the patients. A total of 95 patients completed the assessment form. The validity was tested by a correlation analysis comparing the questionnaire with the original score.
RESULTS: The questionnaire demonstrated a reproducible and significant (p<0.001), very high correlation (r>0.9) in the overall results and a moderate to very high correlation within single parameters (r>0.68).
CONCLUSION: Based on these results, it can be concluded that a valid and reproducible assessment of the original score is possible with the new questionnaire. Self-evaluation allows reliable assessment which is not dependent on the examiners or location, resulting in a higher number of patients reachable for follow-up studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17160397     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-006-1198-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  21 in total

1.  Scoring systems for shoulder conditions.

Authors:  A A Romeo; B R Bach; K L O'Halloran
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  A self-administered questionnaire for assessment of symptoms and function of the shoulder.

Authors:  J C L'Insalata; R F Warren; S B Cohen; D W Altchek; M G Peterson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder.

Authors:  C R Constant; A H Murley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Displaced proximal humeral fractures. Part I. Classification and evaluation. By Charles S. Neer, I, 1970.

Authors:  C S Neer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  [Outcome analysis after open reconstruction of rotator cuff ruptures. A comparative assessment of recent evaluation procedures].

Authors:  M Skutek; J Zeichen; R W Fremerey; U Bosch
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  The Bankart procedure: a long-term end-result study.

Authors:  C R Rowe; D Patel; W W Southmayd
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  The benefits of using patient-based methods of assessment. Medium-term results of an observational study of shoulder surgery.

Authors:  J Dawson; G Hill; R Fitzpatrick; A Carr
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-08

Review 8.  A review of self-report scales for the assessment of functional limitation and disability of the shoulder.

Authors:  L A Michener; B G Leggin
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2001 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.950

9.  The subjective shoulder rating system.

Authors:  D Kohn; M Geyer
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Shoulder function in patients with unoperated anterior shoulder instability.

Authors:  L Tsai; T Wredmark; C Johansson; K Gibo; B Engström; H Törnqvist
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Munich Shoulder Questionnaire (MSQ): development and validation of an effective patient-reported tool for outcome measurement and patient safety in shoulder surgery.

Authors:  Florian Schmidutz; Marc Beirer; Volker Braunstein; Viktoria Bogner; Ernst Wiedemann; Peter Biberthaler
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2012-05-18

2.  Healing rates for challenging rotator cuff tears utilizing an acellular human dermal reinforcement graft.

Authors:  Vivek Agrawal
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2012-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.