Literature DB >> 11460452

[Outcome analysis after open reconstruction of rotator cuff ruptures. A comparative assessment of recent evaluation procedures].

M Skutek1, J Zeichen, R W Fremerey, U Bosch.   

Abstract

Outcome evaluation is becoming increasingly important for reconstructive surgery in musculoskeletal diseases. In addition to established shoulder-scores, new outcome-scores are being developed to cover all effects caused by a disease or intervention. Three validated, self-administered shoulder questionnaires were applied prospectively in 23 otherwise healthy patients suffering from rotator cuff deficiency. These were correlated to the Constant-Murley Shoulder Score and to a visual analogue scale for satisfaction. 7 women and 16 men with combined tears of supraspinatus and infraspinatus (mean age 55.3 +/- 10.5, r/l: 14/9, FU 57.8 +/- 15.7 weeks) were gathered prospectively and evaluated pre- and postoperatively with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Index (ASES), the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Module (DASH questionnaire). In addition, a visual analogue scale for satisfaction was employed. All four scores as well as the visual analogue scale revealed improvement at a statistically significant level (paired, two-tailed t-test, P < 0.01) after surgery. All questionnaires had a significant correlation with the Constant-Murley Shoulder Score (Pearson's correlation coefficient: ASES: r = 0.871, P < 0.01; DASH: r = -0.758, P = < 0.01; SST: r = 0.494, P < 0.05). All were easy to apply and provided a reliable, postoperative evaluation of shoulder function. The SST was easy to apply, however compound outcome analysis was only possible with the ASES Shoulder Index and the DASH questionnaire. The DASH scale was the most complex evaluation instrument. The Constant-Murley Shoulder Score comprises a physical examination which is advantageous but must be carried out in the clinic. For postoperative assessment, without the patient having to return to the clinic, the ASES Shoulder Index is preferred as it correlates well with the Constant-Murley Shoulder Score (r = 0.871) and the visual analogue scale for satisfaction (r = 0.762).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11460452     DOI: 10.1007/s001130170109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  4 in total

1.  [Open transosseous reconstruction of the rotator cuff: clinical outcome, influencing factors and complications].

Authors:  D Maier; M Jaeger; K Izadpanah; D Herschel; P Ogon; P C Strohm; N P Südkamp
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  [Development of a questionnaire for patient self-assessment of shoulder function based on the Rowe score].

Authors:  A Kupsch; M A Kessler; M Weis; A Imhoff
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  [Development of a questionnaire based on the Constant-Murley-Score for self-evaluation of shoulder function by patients].

Authors:  D Boehm; N Wollmerstedt; M Doesch; M Handwerker; E Mehling; F Gohlke
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  [Evaluation of shoulder arthroplasty in treatment of four-fragment fractures of the proximal humerus].

Authors:  H Schmal; C Klemt; N P Südkamp
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.000

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.