Literature DB >> 1715962

Euthanasia and other medical decisions concerning the end of life.

P J Van Der Maas1, J J Van Delden, L Pijnenborg, C W Looman.   

Abstract

This article presents the first results of the Dutch nationwide study on euthanasia and other medical decisions concerning the end of life (MDEL). The study was done at the request of the Dutch government in preparation for a discussion about legislation on euthanasia. Three studies were undertaken: detailed interviews with 405 physicians, the mailing of questionnaires to the physicians of a sample of 7000 deceased persons, and the collecting of information about 2250 deaths by a prospective survey among the respondents to the interviews. The alleviation of pain and symptoms with such high dosages of opioids that the patient's life might be shortened was the most important MDEL in 17.5% of all deaths. In another 17.5% a non-treatment decision was the most important MDEL. Euthanasia by administering lethal drugs at the patient's request seems to have been done in 1.8% of all deaths. Since MDEL were taken in 38% of all deaths (and in 54% of all non-acute deaths) we conclude that these decisions are common medical practice and should get more attention in research, teaching, and public debate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; Remmelink Commission

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1715962     DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91241-l

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  65 in total

Review 1.  Drugs used in physician-assisted death.

Authors:  D L Willems; J H Groenewoud; G van der Wal
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Reframing the professional ethic: the Council of Medical Specialty Societies consensus statement on the ethic of medicine.

Authors:  S C Charles; J A Lazarus
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-09

Review 3.  [Ethics in intensive medicine].

Authors:  W F List
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Legislation on euthanasia: recent developments in The Netherlands.

Authors:  J K Gevers
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  A common ethics for a common market?

Authors:  S Holm
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-02-15

Review 6.  [Indirect euthanasia : Medical and legal implications].

Authors:  S Roggendorf; W U Eckart
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Physicians and euthanasia: a Canadian print-media discourse analysis of physician perspectives.

Authors:  David Kenneth Wright; Jennifer R Fishman; Hadi Karsoho; Sarah Sandham; Mary Ellen Macdonald
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-04-02

8.  Euthanasia around the world.

Authors:  T Helme
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-03-14

9.  Existential concerns of terminally ill cancer patients receiving specialized palliative care in Japan.

Authors:  Tatsuya Morita; Masako Kawa; Yoshifumi Honke; Hiroyuki Kohara; Etsuko Maeyama; Yoshiyuki Kizawa; Tatsuo Akechi; Yosuke Uchitomi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Deciding not to resuscitate in Dutch hospitals.

Authors:  J J van Delden; P J van der Maas; L Pijnenborg; C W Looman
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.903

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.