Literature DB >> 17159525

Does unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis require urgent stabilization?

Socrates Kalogrianitis1, Chin Khoon Tan, Graham J Kemp, Alfred Bass, Colin Bruce.   

Abstract

Controversy exists regarding the role of early reduction and stabilization in the management of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis. It seems logical that early reduction and stabilization of an unstable slip might preserve the remaining blood supply to the epiphysis and reduce the incidence of avascular necrosis. Some studies have indeed shown lower rates of avascular necrosis following early reduction and stabilization, but others have shown the contrary. To try to resolve this disagreement, we conducted a retrospective review of slipped capital femoral epiphysis treated in Alder Hey Hospital over a 4-year period. We reviewed 117 consecutive slips in 82 children (43 boys and 39 girls, mean age 12 years), treated by internal fixation from 1998 to 2002. Mean follow-up was 18 months (range, 12-48 months). Sixteen cases (19%) were unstable at presentation. Avascular necrosis developed in eight of these, of which all but one were treated between 24 and 72 h after symptom onset. The eight unstable slips that did not develop avascular necrosis were treated either within 24 h (five children) or at 8 days (three children). Avascular necrosis did not develop in any of the stable slips. We recommend immediate stabilization of unstable slips presenting within 24 h. If this is not possible because of delayed presentation, we recommend deferring definitive management until at least a week has elapsed. This study supports the notion that there is a definite period of time during which medical intervention increases the risk of avascular necrosis and should be actively avoided. We term this period 'the unsafe window'.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17159525     DOI: 10.1097/01.bpb.0000236224.14325.f1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B        ISSN: 1060-152X            Impact factor:   1.041


  6 in total

1.  Clinical stability of slipped capital femoral epiphysis does not correlate with intraoperative stability.

Authors:  Kai Ziebarth; Stephan Domayer; Theddy Slongo; Young-Jo Kim; Reinhold Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Patients with unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis have antecedent symptoms.

Authors:  Thomas G McPartland; Wudbhav N Sankar; Young-Jo Kim; Michael B Millis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Unstable SCFE: review of treatment modalities and prevalence of osteonecrosis.

Authors:  Ira Zaltz; Geneva Baca; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Percutaneous pinning after prolonged skeletal traction with the hip in a flexed position for unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis: A case series of 11 patients.

Authors:  Masaki Matsushita; Kenichi Mishima; Kohji Iwata; Tadashi Hattori; Naoki Ishiguro; Hiroshi Kitoh
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 5.  Treatment of stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis: systematic review and exploratory patient level analysis.

Authors:  H Naseem; S Chatterji; K Tsang; M Hakimi; A Chytas; S Alshryda
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-08-22

6.  Outcomes after slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a population-based study with three-year follow-up.

Authors:  B Herngren; M Stenmarker; K Enskär; G Hägglund
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 1.548

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.