Literature DB >> 17159159

Canopy leaf area constrains [CO2]-induced enhancement of productivity and partitioning among aboveground carbon pools.

Heather R McCarthy1, Ram Oren, Adrien C Finzi, Kurt H Johnsen.   

Abstract

Net primary productivity (NPP) is enhanced under future atmospheric [CO2] in temperate forests representing a broad range of productivity. Yet questions remain in regard to how elevated [CO2]-induced NPP enhancement may be affected by climatic variations and limiting nutrient resources, as well as how this additional production is distributed among carbon (C) pools of different longevities. Using 10 years of data from the Duke free-air CO2 enrichment (Duke FACE) site, we show that spatially, the major control of NPP was nitrogen (N) availability, through its control on canopy leaf area index (L). Elevated CO2 levels resulted in greater L, and thus greater NPP. After canopy closure had occurred, elevated [CO2] did not enhance NPP at a given L, regardless of soil water availability. Additionally, using published data from three other forest FACE sites and replacing L with leaf area duration (LD) to account for differences in growing season length, we show that aboveground NPP responded to [CO2] only through the enhancement of LD. For broadleaf forests, the fraction of aboveground NPP partitioned to wood biomass saturated with increasing LD and was not enhanced by [CO2], whereas it linearly decreased for the conifer forest but was enhanced by [CO2]. These results underscore the importance of resolving [CO2] effects on L to assess the response of NPP and C allocation. Further study is necessary to elucidate the mechanisms that control the differential allocation of C among aboveground pools in different forest types.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17159159      PMCID: PMC1748230          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0609448103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  12 in total

1.  Tropospheric O(3) compromises net primary production in young stands of trembling aspen, paper birch and sugar maple in response to elevated atmospheric CO(2).

Authors:  John S King; Mark E Kubiske; Kurt S Pregitzer; George R Hendrey; Evan P McDonald; Christian P Giardina; Vanessa S Quinn; David F Karnosky
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 10.151

2.  Primary production of the biosphere: integrating terrestrial and oceanic components

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-07-10       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Soil fertility limits carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems in a CO2-enriched atmosphere.

Authors:  R Oren; D S Ellsworth; K H Johnsen; N Phillips; B E Ewers; C Maier; K V Schäfer; H McCarthy; G Hendrey; S G McNulty; G G Katul
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-05-24       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity.

Authors:  Richard J Norby; Evan H Delucia; Birgit Gielen; Carlo Calfapietra; Christian P Giardina; John S King; Joanne Ledford; Heather R McCarthy; David J P Moore; Reinhart Ceulemans; Paolo De Angelis; Adrien C Finzi; David F Karnosky; Mark E Kubiske; Martin Lukac; Kurt S Pregitzer; Giuseppe E Scarascia-Mugnozza; William H Schlesinger; Ram Oren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Aboveground sink strength in forests controls the allocation of carbon below ground and its [CO2]-induced enhancement.

Authors:  Sari Palmroth; Ram Oren; Heather R McCarthy; Kurt H Johnsen; Adrien C Finzi; John R Butnor; Michael G Ryan; William H Schlesinger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Net carbon storage in a poplar plantation (POPFACE) after three years of free-air CO2 enrichment.

Authors:  B Gielen; C Calfapietra; M Lukac; V E Wittig; P De Angelis; I A Janssens; M C Moscatelli; S Grego; M F Cotrufo; D L Godbold; M R Hoosbeek; S P Long; F Miglietta; A Polle; C J Bernacchi; P A Davey; R Ceulemans; G E Scarascia-Mugnozza
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.196

7.  A simple method for estimating gross carbon budgets for vegetation in forest ecosystems.

Authors:  Michael G. Ryan
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  1991 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 4.196

8.  Radiation-use efficiency of a forest exposed to elevated concentrations of atmospheric carbon dioxide.

Authors:  Evan H DeLucia; Kate George; Jason G Hamilton
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.196

9.  Leaf dynamics of a deciduous forest canopy: no response to elevated CO2.

Authors:  Richard J Norby; Johnna D Sholtis; Carla A Gunderson; Sara S Jawdy
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Fine-root production dominates response of a deciduous forest to atmospheric CO2 enrichment.

Authors:  Richard J Norby; Joanne Ledford; Carolyn D Reilly; Nicole E Miller; Elizabeth G O'Neill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-21       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  11 in total

1.  Incorporating the effects of changes in vegetation functioning and CO2 on water availability in plant habitat models.

Authors:  Sophie Rickebusch; Wilfried Thuiller; Thomas Hickler; Miguel B Arau Jo; Martin T Sykes; Oliver Schweiger; Bruno Lafourcade
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 2.  CO2 studies remain key to understanding a future world.

Authors:  Katie M Becklin; S Michael Walker; Danielle A Way; Joy K Ward
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 10.151

3.  The spatial factor, rather than elevated CO₂, controls the soil bacterial community in a temperate Forest Ecosystem.

Authors:  Yuan Ge; Chengrong Chen; Zhihong Xu; Ram Oren; Ji-Zheng He
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Effects of species richness and elevated carbon dioxide on biomass accumulation: a synthesis using meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xianzhong Wang
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-03-10       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Aboveground sink strength in forests controls the allocation of carbon below ground and its [CO2]-induced enhancement.

Authors:  Sari Palmroth; Ram Oren; Heather R McCarthy; Kurt H Johnsen; Adrien C Finzi; John R Butnor; Michael G Ryan; William H Schlesinger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Responses of Woody Plant Functional Traits to Nitrogen Addition: A Meta-Analysis of Leaf Economics, Gas Exchange, and Hydraulic Traits.

Authors:  Hongxia Zhang; Weibin Li; Henry D Adams; Anzhi Wang; Jiabing Wu; Changjie Jin; Dexin Guan; Fenghui Yuan
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Nutrient enrichment increases mortality of mangroves.

Authors:  Catherine E Lovelock; Marilyn C Ball; Katherine C Martin; Ilka C Feller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Experimental evidence shows minor contribution of nitrogen deposition to global forest carbon sequestration.

Authors:  Lena F Schulte-Uebbing; Gerard H Ros; Wim de Vries
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 13.211

9.  From sink to source: Regional variation in U.S. forest carbon futures.

Authors:  David N Wear; John W Coulston
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Interannual variability of leaf area index of an evergreen conifer stand was affected by carry-over effects from recent climate conditions.

Authors:  Akihiro Sumida; Tsutomu Watanabe; Tomiyasu Miyaura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.