Literature DB >> 17158588

Gradual soil water depletion results in reversible changes of gene expression, protein profiles, ecophysiology, and growth performance in Populus euphratica, a poplar growing in arid regions.

Marie-Béatrice Bogeat-Triboulot1, Mikael Brosché, Jenny Renaut, Laurent Jouve, Didier Le Thiec, Payam Fayyaz, Basia Vinocur, Erwin Witters, Kris Laukens, Thomas Teichmann, Arie Altman, Jean-François Hausman, Andrea Polle, Jaakko Kangasjärvi, Erwin Dreyer.   

Abstract

The responses of Populus euphratica Oliv. plants to soil water deficit were assessed by analyzing gene expression, protein profiles, and several plant performance criteria to understand the acclimation of plants to soil water deficit. Young, vegetatively propagated plants originating from an arid, saline field site were submitted to a gradually increasing water deficit for 4 weeks in a greenhouse and were allowed to recover for 10 d after full reirrigation. Time-dependent changes and intensity of the perturbations induced in shoot and root growth, xylem anatomy, gas exchange, and water status were recorded. The expression profiles of approximately 6,340 genes and of proteins and metabolites (pigments, soluble carbohydrates, and oxidative compounds) were also recorded in mature leaves and in roots (gene expression only) at four stress levels and after recovery. Drought successively induced shoot growth cessation, stomatal closure, moderate increases in oxidative stress-related compounds, loss of CO2 assimilation, and root growth reduction. These effects were almost fully reversible, indicating that acclimation was dominant over injury. The physiological responses were paralleled by fully reversible transcriptional changes, including only 1.5% of the genes on the array. Protein profiles displayed greater changes than transcript levels. Among the identified proteins for which expressed sequence tags were present on the array, no correlation was found between transcript and protein abundance. Acclimation to water deficit involves the regulation of different networks of genes in roots and shoots. Such diverse requirements for protecting and maintaining the function of different plant organs may render plant engineering or breeding toward improved drought tolerance more complex than previously anticipated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17158588      PMCID: PMC1803728          DOI: 10.1104/pp.106.088708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  58 in total

1.  Characterization of SP1, a stress-responsive, boiling-soluble, homo-oligomeric protein from aspen.

Authors:  Wang-Xia Wang; Dan Pelah; Tal Alergand; Oded Shoseyov; Arie Altman
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Clonal and seasonal differences in leaf osmotic potential and organic solutes of five hybrid poplar clones grown under field conditions.

Authors:  G. Michael Gebre; Timothy J. Tschaplinski; Gerald A. Tuskan; Donald E. Todd
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.196

3.  Responses of poplar to chilling temperatures: proteomic and physiological aspects.

Authors:  J Renaut; S Lutts; L Hoffmann; J-F Hausman
Journal:  Plant Biol (Stuttg)       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.081

4.  The stability of the Arabidopsis transcriptome in transgenic plants expressing the marker genes nptII and uidA.

Authors:  Souad El Ouakfaoui; Brian Miki
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.417

5.  Proteome analysis of sugar beet leaves under drought stress.

Authors:  Mohsen Hajheidari; Mohammad Abdollahian-Noghabi; Hossein Askari; Manzar Heidari; Seyed Y Sadeghian; Eric S Ober; Ghasem Hosseini Salekdeh
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.984

6.  Comprehensive expression profile analysis of the Arabidopsis Hsp70 gene family.

Authors:  D Y Sung; E Vierling; C L Guy
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Novel regulation of aquaporins during osmotic stress.

Authors:  Rosario Vera-Estrella; Bronwyn J Barkla; Hans J Bohnert; Omar Pantoja
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2004-08-06       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Differential mRNA translation contributes to gene regulation under non-stress and dehydration stress conditions in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Riki Kawaguchi; Thomas Girke; Elizabeth A Bray; Julia Bailey-Serres
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.417

9.  The Arabidopsis-accelerated cell death gene ACD1 is involved in oxygenation of pheophorbide a: inhibition of the pheophorbide a oxygenase activity does not lead to the "stay-green" phenotype in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Ryouichi Tanaka; Masumi Hirashima; Soichirou Satoh; Ayumi Tanaka
Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.927

10.  Drought resistance of two hybrid Populus clones grown in a large-scale plantation.

Authors:  Timothy J. Tschaplinski; Gerald A. Tuskan; G. Michael Gebre; Donald E. Todd
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.196

View more
  62 in total

1.  A shared response of thaumatin like protein, chitinase, and late embryogenesis abundant protein3 to environmental stresses in tea [Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze].

Authors:  Richard Chalo Muoki; Asosii Paul; Sanjay Kumar
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 3.410

2.  Comparative expression and transcript initiation of three peach dehydrin genes.

Authors:  Carole Leavel Bassett; Michael E Wisniewski; Timothy S Artlip; Greg Richart; John L Norelli; Robert E Farrell
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 4.116

Review 3.  Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell.

Authors:  M M Chaves; J Flexas; C Pinheiro
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Increased water use efficiency and water productivity of arabidopsis by abscisic acid receptors from Populus canescens.

Authors:  Michael Papacek; Alexander Christmann; Erwin Grill
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 5.  Forest tree genomics: growing resources and applications.

Authors:  David B Neale; Antoine Kremer
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Dynamic changes in the leaf proteome of a C3 xerophyte, Citrullus lanatus (wild watermelon), in response to water deficit.

Authors:  Kinya Akashi; Kazuo Yoshida; Masayoshi Kuwano; Masataka Kajikawa; Kazuya Yoshimura; Saki Hoshiyasu; Naoyuki Inagaki; Akiho Yokota
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2011-01-23       Impact factor: 4.116

7.  Exploiting Differential Gene Expression and Epistasis to Discover Candidate Genes for Drought-Associated QTLs in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  John T Lovell; Jack L Mullen; David B Lowry; Kedija Awole; James H Richards; Saunak Sen; Paul E Verslues; Thomas E Juenger; John K McKay
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 11.277

8.  An integrative overview of the molecular and physiological responses of sugarcane under drought conditions.

Authors:  Camilo Elber Vital; Andrea Giordano; Eduardo de Almeida Soares; Thomas Christopher Rhys Williams; Rosilene Oliveira Mesquita; Pedro Marcus Pereira Vidigal; Amanda de Santana Lopes; Túlio Gomes Pacheco; Marcelo Rogalski; Humberto Josué de Oliveira Ramos; Marcelo Ehlers Loureiro
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.076

9.  Comparative physiological and leaf proteome analysis between drought-tolerant chickpea Cicer reticulatum and drought-sensitive chickpea C. arietinum.

Authors:  Sertan Cevik; Gurler Akpinar; Aytunc Yildizli; Murat Kasap; Kubra Karaosmanoglu; Serpil Unyayar
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Plant physiology and proteomics reveals the leaf response to drought in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.).

Authors:  Iker Aranjuelo; Gemma Molero; Gorka Erice; Jean Christophe Avice; Salvador Nogués
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 6.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.