Literature DB >> 17157932

Spatial learning in Long-Evans Hooded rats and C57BL/6J mice: different strategies for different performance.

Arnaud Cressant1, Morgane Besson, Sandra Suarez, Anne Cormier, Sylvie Granon.   

Abstract

Spatial learning abilities of rodents have been extensively used to explore the management of a wide range of cognitive and emotional processes such as learning, memory, attention and anxiety. Knowledge about the organization and processing of spatial learning has mainly been obtained in rats. Due to increasing generation of genetically modified mice, cognitive abilities of mice are now extensively tested. The present paper aimed at comparing spatial representation, learning and strategies in C57BL/6J mice and Long-Evans Hooded rats when subjected to the same spatial learning paradigm, i.e. learning a food location in a crossmaze. We also analyzed the influence of environmental richness on learning modalities in both species. Our results showed that rats and mice could exhibit similar spatial learning abilities in some circumstances. However, Long-Evans rats and C57BL/6J mice may set up different strategies depending on the availability of visual information within the environment. Rats' learning strategies mainly relied on distant visual cues and seemed more efficient than those used by mice as they needed less time than mice to solve the task. We emphasize that the strategies of mice are less robust and flexible than the ones set up by rats. Finally, the richness of the environment was shown to affect speed and quality of spatial learning in both species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17157932     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  10 in total

1.  Spatiotemporal Contrast Sensitivity of Brown-Norway Rats under Scotopic and Photopic Illumination.

Authors:  Nicholas P Johnson; Sarah M Gregorich; Christopher L Passaglia
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  In Vivo Multi-Day Calcium Imaging of CA1 Hippocampus in Freely Moving Rats Reveals a High Preponderance of Place Cells with Consistent Place Fields.

Authors:  Hannah S Wirtshafter; John F Disterhoft
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 6.709

3.  Genetic background differences and nonassociative effects in mouse trace fear conditioning.

Authors:  Dani R Smith; Michela Gallagher; Mark E Stanton
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Wild genius - domestic fool? Spatial learning abilities of wild and domestic guinea pigs.

Authors:  Lars Lewejohann; Thorsten Pickel; Norbert Sachser; Sylvia Kaiser
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 5.  The importance of cognitive phenotypes in experimental modeling of animal anxiety and depression.

Authors:  Allan V Kalueff; Dennis L Murphy
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.599

6.  Longterm-habituation of the startle response in mice is stimulus modality, but not context specific.

Authors:  Peter K D Pilz; Stephan W Arnold; Anja T Rischawy; Claudia F Plappert
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-09

7.  Behavioral flexibility is increased by optogenetic inhibition of neurons in the nucleus accumbens shell during specific time segments.

Authors:  Luca Aquili; Andrew W Liu; Mayumi Shindou; Tomomi Shindou; Jeffery R Wickens
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  Mice and rats achieve similar levels of performance in an adaptive decision-making task.

Authors:  Santiago Jaramillo; Anthony M Zador
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-18

9.  The object space task shows cumulative memory expression in both mice and rats.

Authors:  Lisa Genzel; Evelien Schut; Tim Schröder; Ronny Eichler; Mehdi Khamassi; Angela Gomez; Irene Navarro Lobato; Francesco Battaglia
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Reduced expression of nogo-a leads to motivational deficits in rats.

Authors:  Thomas Enkel; Stefan M Berger; Kai Schönig; Björn Tews; Dusan Bartsch
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.558

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.