Literature DB >> 33035619

Spatiotemporal Contrast Sensitivity of Brown-Norway Rats under Scotopic and Photopic Illumination.

Nicholas P Johnson1, Sarah M Gregorich2, Christopher L Passaglia3.   

Abstract

Rats are a popular animal model for vision research and for investigating disorders of the visual system. The study aimed to quantify the spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity function (CSF) of healthy adult Brown-Norway rats under scotopic and photopic illumination. Animals were trained to jump onto the one of two adjacent platforms behind which was displayed a sinewave grating pattern. Contrast thresholds of light- and dark-adapted rats were determined using a staircase method of adjustment for gratings that varied in spatial frequency (sf) and temporal frequency (tf) and ranged several log-units in mean luminance. Photopic CSFs showed strong bandpass spatial tuning, consistent with prior measurements, and weak bandpass temporal tuning. CSFs were parameterized by a truncated log-parabola model, yielding a peak contrast sensitivity of 52 ± 9, peak sf of 0.17 ± 0.05 cycles/degree, sf limit of 1.6 ± 0.3 cycles/degree, low sf attenuation of 85 ± 9%, peak tf of 1.7 ± 1.1 Hz, extrapolated tf limit of 166 ± 44 Hz, and low tf attenuation of 55 ± 12%. CSFs became more lowpass and decreased systematically in contrast sensitivity and spatiotemporal acuity as mean luminance was reduced. CSFs were also measured via the visual head-tracking reflex. Photopic contrast sensitivity, spatial acuity, and temporal acuity were all markedly below that of the grating detection task and optomotor findings for other rat strains. The CSF data provide a comprehensive and quantitative description of rat spatial and temporal vision and a benchmark for evaluating effects of ocular diseases on their ability to see.
Copyright © 2020 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  contrast threshold; frequency response; optomotor reflex; spatial acuity; temporal acuity

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33035619      PMCID: PMC7642022          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.09.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  65 in total

1.  Receptive field properties of single neurons in rat primary visual cortex.

Authors:  S V Girman; Y Sauvé; R D Lund
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Behavioral assessment of visual acuity in mice and rats.

Authors:  G T Prusky; P W West; R M Douglas
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 3.  The receptive fields of cat retinal ganglion cells in physiological and pathological states: where we are after half a century of research.

Authors:  J B Troy; T Shou
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 21.198

4.  The most numerous ganglion cell type of the mouse retina is a selective feature detector.

Authors:  Yifeng Zhang; In-Jung Kim; Joshua R Sanes; Markus Meister
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Vernier and grating acuity in adult hooded rats: the influence of sex.

Authors:  P Seymoure; J M Juraska
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Discordant anatomical, electrophysiological, and visual behavioral profiles of retinal degeneration in rat models of retinal degenerative disease.

Authors:  Trevor J McGill; Glen T Prusky; Robert M Douglas; Douglas Yasumura; Michael T Matthes; Robert J Lowe; Jacque L Duncan; Haidong Yang; Kelly Ahern; Kate M Daniello; Byron Silver; Matthew M LaVail
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Enhancement of vision by monocular deprivation in adult mice.

Authors:  Glen T Prusky; Nazia M Alam; Robert M Douglas
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The touchscreen cognitive testing method for rodents: how to get the best out of your rat.

Authors:  Timothy J Bussey; Tina L Padain; Elizabeth A Skillings; Boyer D Winters; A Jennifer Morton; Lisa M Saksida
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 2.460

9.  A comparison of rats and mice in a swimming pool place task and matching to place task: some surprising differences.

Authors:  I Q Whishaw
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1995-10

10.  An automated platform for high-throughput mouse behavior and physiology with voluntary head-fixation.

Authors:  Ryo Aoki; Tadashi Tsubota; Yuki Goya; Andrea Benucci
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  1 in total

1.  Characteristics of gut microbiota in representative mice strains: Implications for biological research.

Authors:  Jianguo Guo; Chenchen Song; Yunbo Liu; Xuying Wu; Wei Dong; Hua Zhu; Zhiguang Xiang; Chuan Qin
Journal:  Animal Model Exp Med       Date:  2022-07-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.