BACKGROUND & AIMS: The blood grou. METHODS: We compared the ability of published PCR-based methods to assess BabA status with BabA immunoblotting and Lewis b (Le(b)) binding activity assays. We also used immunoblotting to examine the relationship between clinical presentation and levels of BabA expression. RESULTS: Immunoblotting and Le(b) binding assays for 80 strains revealed 3 levels of BabA expression: BabA high producers (BabA-H) with Le(b) binding activity, BabA low producers (BabA-L) without Le(b) binding activity, and BabA-negative. BabA-negative strains lacked the babA gene. PCR methods to determine BabA status yielded poor results. babA1 sequences were never detected. BabA expression was examined in 250 strains from Western countries and 270 strains from East Asia. The results failed to confirm any relationship between triple-positive status (cagA-positive/vacA s1/BabA-H) and clinical outcome. BabA-negative strains typically were cagA-negative/vacA s2 and were associated with gastritis. BabA-L strains showed a higher level of mucosal injury and were associated more frequently with duodenal ulcer and gastric cancer than the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Information gained from currently used PCR-based methods must be interpreted with caution. Le(b) binding activity does not accurately reflect the severity of mucosal damage or the clinical outcome. Quantitation of BabA expression revealed that Le(b)-nonbinding BabA-L strains are associated with higher levels of mucosal injury and clinical outcome.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The blood grou. METHODS: We compared the ability of published PCR-based methods to assess BabA status with BabA immunoblotting and Lewis b (Le(b)) binding activity assays. We also used immunoblotting to examine the relationship between clinical presentation and levels of BabA expression. RESULTS: Immunoblotting and Le(b) binding assays for 80 strains revealed 3 levels of BabA expression: BabA high producers (BabA-H) with Le(b) binding activity, BabA low producers (BabA-L) without Le(b) binding activity, and BabA-negative. BabA-negative strains lacked the babA gene. PCR methods to determine BabA status yielded poor results. babA1 sequences were never detected. BabA expression was examined in 250 strains from Western countries and 270 strains from East Asia. The results failed to confirm any relationship between triple-positive status (cagA-positive/vacA s1/BabA-H) and clinical outcome. BabA-negative strains typically were cagA-negative/vacA s2 and were associated with gastritis. BabA-L strains showed a higher level of mucosal injury and were associated more frequently with duodenal ulcer and gastric cancer than the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Information gained from currently used PCR-based methods must be interpreted with caution. Le(b) binding activity does not accurately reflect the severity of mucosal damage or the clinical outcome. Quantitation of BabA expression revealed that Le(b)-nonbinding BabA-L strains are associated with higher levels of mucosal injury and clinical outcome.
Authors: Yoshio Yamaoka; Julianne Souchek; Stefan Odenbreit; Rainer Haas; Anna Arnqvist; Thomas Borén; Tadashi Kodama; Michael S Osato; Oscar Gutierrez; Jong G Kim; David Y Graham Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Roland Rad; Markus Gerhard; Roland Lang; Martin Schöniger; Thomas Rösch; Wolfgang Schepp; Ingrid Becker; Hermann Wagner; Christian Prinz Journal: J Immunol Date: 2002-03-15 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: M Gerhard; N Lehn; N Neumayer; T Borén; R Rad; W Schepp; S Miehlke; M Classen; C Prinz Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1999-10-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: C Prinz; M Schöniger; R Rad; I Becker; E Keiditsch; S Wagenpfeil; M Classen; T Rösch; W Schepp; M Gerhard Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2001-03-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: J Yu; W K Leung; M Y Y Go; M C W Chan; K F To; E K W Ng; F K L Chan; T K W Ling; S C S Chung; J J Y Sung Journal: Gut Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Jafar Mahdavi; Berit Sondén; Marina Hurtig; Farzad O Olfat; Lina Forsberg; Niamh Roche; Jonas Angstrom; Thomas Larsson; Susann Teneberg; Karl-Anders Karlsson; Siiri Altraja; Torkel Wadström; Dangeruta Kersulyte; Douglas E Berg; Andre Dubois; Christoffer Petersson; Karl-Eric Magnusson; Thomas Norberg; Frank Lindh; Bertil B Lundskog; Anna Arnqvist; Lennart Hammarström; Thomas Borén Journal: Science Date: 2002-07-26 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Yoshio Yamaoka; Shogo Kikuchi; Hala M T el-Zimaity; Oscar Gutierrez; Michael S Osato; David Y Graham Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 22.682