Literature DB >> 17154684

Validation of CFD simulations of cerebral aneurysms with implication of geometric variations.

Yiemeng Hoi1, Scott H Woodward, Minsuok Kim, Dale B Taulbee, Hui Meng.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations using medical-image-based anatomical vascular geometry are now gaining clinical relevance. This study aimed at validating the CFD methodology for studying cerebral aneurysms by using particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurements, with a focus on the effects of small geometric variations in aneurysm models on the flow dynamics obtained with CFD. METHOD OF APPROACH: An experimental phantom was fabricated out of silicone elastomer to best mimic a spherical aneurysm model. PIV measurements were obtained from the phantom and compared with the CFD results from an ideal spherical aneurysm model (S1). These measurements were also compared with CFD results, based on the geometry reconstructed from three-dimensional images of the experimental phantom. We further performed CFD analysis on two geometric variations, S2 and S3, of the phantom to investigate the effects of small geometric variations on the aneurysmal flow field. Results. We found poor agreement between the CFD results from the ideal spherical aneurysm model and the PIV measurements from the phantom, including inconsistent secondary flow patterns. The CFD results based on the actual phantom geometry, however, matched well with the PIV measurements. CFD of models S2 and S3 produced qualitatively similar flow fields to that of the phantom but quantitatively significant changes in key hemodynamic parameters such as vorticity, positive circulation, and wall shear stress.
CONCLUSION: CFD simulation results can closely match experimental measurements as long as both are performed on the same model geometry. Small geometric variations on the aneurysm model can significantly alter the flow-field and key hemodynamic parameters. Since medical images are subjected to geometric uncertainties, image-based patient-specific CFD results must be carefully scrutinized before providing clinical feedback.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17154684      PMCID: PMC2754174          DOI: 10.1115/1.2354209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  41 in total

1.  Reconstruction of blood flow patterns in a human carotid bifurcation: a combined CFD and MRI study.

Authors:  Q Long; X Y Xu; B Ariff; S A Thom; A D Hughes; A V Stanton
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Computational blood flow modeling based on in vivo measurements.

Authors:  J A Moore; B K Rutt; S J Karlik; K Yin; C R Ethier
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  MRI measurement of wall shear stress vectors in bifurcation models and comparison with CFD predictions.

Authors:  U Köhler; I Marshall; M B Robertson; Q Long; X Y Xu; P R Hoskins
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Validation of the coupling of magnetic resonance imaging velocity measurements with computational fluid dynamics in a U bend.

Authors:  F P Glor; J J M Westenberg; J Vierendeels; M Danilouchkine; P Verdonck
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.094

Review 5.  Image-based computational fluid dynamics modeling in realistic arterial geometries.

Authors:  David A Steinman
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Reconstruction of carotid bifurcation hemodynamics and wall thickness using computational fluid dynamics and MRI.

Authors:  David A Steinman; Jonathan B Thomas; Hanif M Ladak; Jaques S Milner; Brian K Rutt; J David Spence
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  A numerical study of blood flow patterns in anatomically realistic and simplified end-to-side anastomoses.

Authors:  J A Moore; D A Steinman; S Prakash; K W Johnston; C R Ethier
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Analysis of slipstream flow in a wide-necked basilar artery aneurysm: evaluation of potential treatment regimens.

Authors:  S G Imbesi; C W Kerber
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  The probability of sudden death from rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Johnson Huang; James M van Gelder
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Particle image velocimetry assessment of stent design influence on intra-aneurysmal flow.

Authors:  Baruch B Lieber; Veronica Livescu; L N Hopkins; Ajay K Wakhloo
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.934

View more
  36 in total

1.  Statistical wall shear stress maps of ruptured and unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms.

Authors:  L Goubergrits; J Schaller; U Kertzscher; N van den Bruck; K Poethkow; Ch Petz; H-Ch Hege; A Spuler
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  Patient-specific modeling of cardiovascular mechanics.

Authors:  C A Taylor; C A Figueroa
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 9.590

3.  Flow in the well: computational fluid dynamics is essential in flow chamber construction.

Authors:  Markus Vogel; Jörg Franke; Wolfram Frank; Horst Schroten
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 2.058

4.  Generalized versus patient-specific inflow boundary conditions in computational fluid dynamics simulations of cerebral aneurysmal hemodynamics.

Authors:  I G H Jansen; J J Schneiders; W V Potters; P van Ooij; R van den Berg; E van Bavel; H A Marquering; C B L M Majoie
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Vascular geometry change because of endovascular stent placement for anterior communicating artery aneurysms.

Authors:  Q-H Huang; Y-F Wu; Y Xu; B Hong; L Zhang; J-M Liu
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  The risk of stanford type-A aortic dissection with different tear size and location: a numerical study.

Authors:  Yue Shi; Minjia Zhu; Yu Chang; Huanyu Qiao; Yongmin Liu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  In vivo validation of numerical prediction for turbulence intensity in an aortic coarctation.

Authors:  Amirhossein Arzani; Petter Dyverfeldt; Tino Ebbers; Shawn C Shadden
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Computational fluid dynamics of cerebral aneurysm coiling using high-resolution and high-energy synchrotron X-ray microtomography: comparison with the homogeneous porous medium approach.

Authors:  Michael R Levitt; Michael C Barbour; Sabine Rolland du Roscoat; Christian Geindreau; Venkat K Chivukula; Patrick M McGah; John D Nerva; Ryan P Morton; Louis J Kim; Alberto Aliseda
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 5.836

9.  Experimental insights into flow impingement in cerebral aneurysm by stereoscopic particle image velocimetry: transition from a laminar regime.

Authors:  Takanobu Yagi; Ayaka Sato; Manabu Shinke; Sara Takahashi; Yasutaka Tobe; Hiroyuki Takao; Yuichi Murayama; Mitsuo Umezu
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Methodology for Computational Fluid Dynamic Validation for Medical Use: Application to Intracranial Aneurysm.

Authors:  Nikhil Paliwal; Robert J Damiano; Nicole A Varble; Vincent M Tutino; Zhongwang Dou; Adnan H Siddiqui; Hui Meng
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.