Literature DB >> 17154228

Ultrasound findings before amniocentesis in selecting the method of analysing the sample.

Karl O Kagan1, Lyn S Chitty, Simona Cicero, Makarios Eleftheriades, Kypros H Nicolaides.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the primary method of cytogenetic analysis in pregnant women undergoing amniocentesis should be quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (qf-PCR), with karyotyping being performed only on those with abnormal ultrasound findings.
METHODS: Amniocentesis was performed in 3854 cases. The median maternal age was 36 years and median gestational age was 18 weeks. The indication for karyotyping was an increased risk for aneuploidy in the absence or presence of sonographic abnormalities detected at the scan before amniocentesis. All samples were analysed by qf-PCR and full karyotyping. For each detectable fetal defect, the positive or negative likelihood ratio for aneuploidy was determined. OUTCOME MEASURE: Detection rate of clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities.
RESULTS: The karyotype was normal in 3617 (93.9%) cases. In 237 (6.1%) cases, the karyotype was abnormal and the detection rate by qf-PCR was 92.4%. A policy of performing qf-PCR in all cases and karyotyping in only those with combined likelihood ratios of > 1, > 3, and > 5 would detect 98.3, 96.6, and 95.4% of all chromosomal abnormalities and would require karyotyping in 16.1, 8.0, and 5.4% of the cases, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: More than 95% of the aneuploidies can be detected if karyotyping is performed in addition to qf-PCR in about 15% of the cases selected on the basis of ultrasound findings before amniocentesis. Copyright 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17154228     DOI: 10.1002/pd.1615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  3 in total

1.  Rapid aneuploidy detection or karyotyping? Ethical reflection.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Daniëlle R M Timmermans; Jan M M van Lith; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Model-based analysis of costs and outcomes of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down's syndrome using cell free fetal DNA in the UK National Health Service.

Authors:  Stephen Morris; Saffron Karlsen; Nancy Chung; Melissa Hill; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  20-year experience on prenatal diagnosis in a reference university medical genetics center in Turkey

Authors:  Burak Durmaz; Hilmi Bolat; Zehra Cengisiz; Fuat Akercan; Tuba Sözen Türk; Erhan Parıltay; Aslı Ece Solmaz; Mert Kazandı; Emin Karaca; Asude Durmaz; Ayça Aykut; Sermet Sağol; Haluk Akın; Ferda Özkınay; ÖzgÜr Çoğulu
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 0.973

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.