Literature DB >> 17153380

Resampling: an optimization method for inverse planning in robotic radiosurgery.

Achim Schweikard1, Alexander Schlaefer, John R Adler.   

Abstract

By design, the range of beam directions in conventional radiosurgery are constrained to an isocentric array. However, the recent introduction of robotic radiosurgery dramatically increases the flexibility of targeting, and as a consequence, beams need be neither coplanar nor isocentric. Such a nonisocentric design permits a large number of distinct beam directions to be used in one single treatment. These major technical differences provide an opportunity to improve upon the well-established principles for treatment planning used with GammaKnife or LINAC radiosurgery. With this objective in mind, our group has developed over the past decade an inverse planning tool for robotic radiosurgery. This system first computes a set of beam directions, and then during an optimization step, weights each individual beam. Optimization begins with a feasibility query, the answer to which is derived through linear programming. This approach offers the advantage of completeness and avoids local optima. Final beam selection is based on heuristics. In this report we present and evaluate a new strategy for utilizing the advantages of linear programming to improve beam selection. Starting from an initial solution, a heuristically determined set of beams is added to the optimization problem, while beams with zero weight are removed. This process is repeated to sample a set of beams much larger compared with typical optimization. Experimental results indicate that the planning approach efficiently finds acceptable plans and that resampling can further improve its efficiency.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17153380     DOI: 10.1118/1.2357020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  7 in total

1.  Robotic ultrasound-guided SBRT of the prostate: feasibility with respect to plan quality.

Authors:  Stefan Gerlach; Ivo Kuhlemann; Philipp Jauer; Ralf Bruder; Floris Ernst; Christoph Fürweger; Alexander Schlaefer
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  A method to improve dose gradient for robotic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Tianfang Li; Cihat Ozhasoglu; Steven Burton; John Flickinger; Dwight E Heron; M Saiful Huq
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Clinical usefulness of MLCs in robotic radiosurgery systems for prostate SBRT.

Authors:  Masashi Tomida; Takeshi Kamomae; Junji Suzuki; Yoichi Ohashi; Yoshiyuki Itoh; Hiroshi Oguchi; Takahito Okuda
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Inverse treatment planning for spinal robotic radiosurgery: an international multi-institutional benchmark trial.

Authors:  Oliver Blanck; Lei Wang; Wolfgang Baus; Jimm Grimm; Thomas Lacornerie; Joakim Nilsson; Sergii Luchkovskyi; Isabel Palazon Cano; Zhenyu Shou; Myriam Ayadi; Harald Treuer; Romain Viard; Frank-Andre Siebert; Mark K H Chan; Guido Hildebrandt; Jürgen Dunst; Detlef Imhoff; Stefan Wurster; Robert Wolff; Pantaleo Romanelli; Eric Lartigau; Robert Semrau; Scott G Soltys; Achim Schweikard
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Impact of prescription isodose level and collimator selection on dose homogeneity and plan quality in robotic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Alexandra Hellerbach; Markus Eichner; Daniel Rueß; Klaus Luyken; Mauritius Hoevels; Michael Judge; Christian Baues; Maximilian Ruge; Martin Kocher; Harald Treuer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Applying pytorch toolkit to plan optimization for circular cone based robotic radiotherapy.

Authors:  Bin Liang; Ran Wei; Jianghu Zhang; Yongbao Li; Tao Yang; Shouping Xu; Ke Zhang; Wenlong Xia; Bin Guo; Bo Liu; Fugen Zhou; Qiuwen Wu; Jianrong Dai
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 4.309

7.  Clinical impact of the VOLO optimizer on treatment plan quality and clinical treatment efficiency for CyberKnife.

Authors:  Emil Schüler; Anthony Lo; Cynthia F Chuang; Scott G Soltys; Erqi L Pollom; Lei Wang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.