| Literature DB >> 17150132 |
Sam M Mbulaiteye1, Benjamin D Gold, Ruth M Pfeiffer, Glen R Brubaker, John Shao, Robert J Biggar, Michie Hisada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is ubiquitous in sub-Saharan Africa, but paradoxically gastric cancer is rare.Entities:
Year: 2006 PMID: 17150132 PMCID: PMC1636024 DOI: 10.1186/1750-9378-1-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Agent Cancer ISSN: 1750-9378 Impact factor: 2.965
Frequency and risk of H. pylori seropositivity among persons residing in rural Tanzania (May to June, 1985)
| Characteristic | No. | OR | 95% CI | P value |
| Sex * | 0.87 | |||
| Female | 402/436 (92%) | Ref. | ||
| Male | 322/351 (92%) | 1.04 | 0.67–1.62 | |
| Age group, years* | <0.001 | |||
| 0–4 | 138/181 (76%) | Ref. | ||
| 5–9 | 168/180 (93%) | 4.4 | 2.42–7.81 | |
| 10–17 | 148/152 (97%) | 11.5 | 4.22–31.4 | |
| ≥18 | 264/268 (99%) | 20.6 | 7.57–56.2 | |
| Birth order† | <0.001 | |||
| 1 | 79/105 (75%) | Ref. | ||
| 2 | 82/101 (91%) | 3.3 | 1.7–6.8 | |
| ≥3 | 136/139 (97%) | 11.1 | 3.7–34 | |
| Next-older sibling ± | 0.08 | |||
| Seronegative | 23/29 (79%) | Ref. | ||
| Seropositive | 189/208 (91) | 2.70 | 0.90–8.34 | |
| Location of village | 0.25 | |||
| Hill | 272/290 (94%) | Ref. | ||
| Valley | 453/498 (91%) | 0.66 | 0.33–1.33 |
Abbreviations: OR odds ratio; CI Confidence Interval
* Sex is missing for one person and age is missing for 7 persons
† Only children with information on birth-order included in this analysis
± "Next-older sibling" refers to the next-older sibling of the case child
Figure 1Th2 type response by age group, in years: Panel A: Percent of H. pylori seropositive individuals with Th2-dominant IgG H. pylori specific immune response by age group. Panel B: Log-transformed IgG1/IgG2 ratio by age group among H. pylori seropositive individuals in rural Tanzania. The X-axis shows age groups in years, the Y-axis shows log-transformed values. The y-line marks the cut-off value for T helper (Th)-dominant 1 vs. Th2-dominant response: values above the line indicate Th2-dominant responses, while values below the line indicate Th1-dominant responses. The line plot connects the median log-transformed IgG1/2 ratios for each age group and the scattered points indicate actual values for each age group.