Literature DB >> 17149982

The effect of dose rate on radiation-induced neoplastic transformation in vitro by low doses of low-LET radiation.

E Elmore1, X-Y Lao, R Kapadia, J L Redpath.   

Abstract

The dependence of the incidence of radiation-induced cancer on the dose rate of the radiation exposure is a question of considerable importance to the estimation of risk of cancer induction by low-dose-rate radiation. Currently a dose and dose-rate effectiveness factor (DDREF) is used to convert high-dose-rate risk estimates to low dose rates. In this study, the end point of neoplastic transformation in vitro has been used to explore this question. It has been shown previously that for low doses of low-LET radiation delivered at high dose rates, there is a suppression of neoplastic transformation frequency at doses less than around 100 mGy. In the present study, dose-response curves up to a total dose of 1000 mGy have been generated for photons from (125)I decay (approximately 30 keV) delivered at doses rates of 0.19, 0.47, 0.91 and 1.9 mGy/min. The results indicate that at dose rates of 1.9 and 0.91 mGy/min the slope of the induction curve is about 1.5 times less than that measured at high dose rate in previous studies with a similar quality of radiation (28 kVp mammographic energy X rays). In the dose region of 0 to 100 mGy, the data were equally well fitted by a threshold or linear no-threshold model. At dose rates of 0.19 and 0.47 mGy/min there was no induction of transformation even at doses up to 1000 mGy, and there was evidence for a possible suppressive effect. These results show that for this in vitro end point the DDREF is very dependent on dose rate and at very low doses and dose rates approaches infinity. The relative risks for the in vitro data compare well with those from epidemiological studies of breast cancer induction by low- and high-dose-rate radiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17149982     DOI: 10.1667/RR0682.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  17 in total

1.  Special issue introduction.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Dose-rate effects of protons on in vivo activation of nuclear factor-kappa B and cytokines in mouse bone marrow cells.

Authors:  Kanokporn Noy Rithidech; Paiboon Reungpatthanaphong; Louise Honikel; Adam Rusek; Sanford R Simon
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  A perspective on the scientific, philosophical, and policy dimensions of hormesis.

Authors:  George R Hoffmann
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  A review: Development of a microdose model for analysis of adaptive response and bystander dose response behavior.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data.

Authors:  Maurice Tubiana; Ludwig E Feinendegen; Chichuan Yang; Joseph M Kaminski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Evidence for radiation hormesis after in vitro exposure of human lymphocytes to low doses of ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Kanokporn Noy Rithidech; Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Human lung cancer risks from radon - part I - influence from bystander effects - a microdose analysis.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard; Richard E Thompson; Georgia C Beecher
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Resveratrol reduces radiation-induced chromosome aberration frequencies in mouse bone marrow cells.

Authors:  Ronald E Carsten; Annette M Bachand; Susan M Bailey; Robert L Ullrich
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  "Protective bystander effects simulated with the state-vector model"--HeLa x skin exposure to Cs not protective bystander response but mammogram and diagnostic X-rays are.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 2.658

10.  Low-dose-radiation stimulated natural chemical and biological protection against lung cancer.

Authors:  B R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.