Literature DB >> 17149763

Gray-scale sonography of solid breast masses: diagnosis of probably benign masses and reduction of the number of biopsies.

Luciano Chala1, Erica Endo, Su Kim, Flávio de Castro, Paula Moraes, Giovanni Cerri, Nestor de Barros.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify probably benign breast masses using gray-scale sonography and to see if this strategy could reduce the number of biopsies of breast masses.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 229 masses in 203 women who underwent sonographically guided percutaneous biopsy. Masses with a negative predictive value for malignancy >98% were retrospectively considered probably benign, and the potential impact of gray-scale sonography in reducing the number of biopsies if these masses were not biopsied was assessed. Assessments were performed considering all masses as a group as well as various subgroups.
RESULTS: Round, ellipsoid, or lobulated masses with 3 or fewer lobulations, circumscribed margins, a longitudinal-anteroposterior diameter ratio > or =1.0 and no marked hypoechogenicity, posterior acoustic shad owing, internal microcalcifications, or altered surrounding breast tissue were considered probably benign. The sensitivity of gray-scale sonography to identify this subgroup was 98%, with a negative predictive value of 99%. If these masses were not biopsied, there would be a 42% reduction in the number of biopsies considering all masses, a 36% reduction for masses classified as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 4, and a 59% reduction for masses exclusively analyzed with sonography.
CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to identify probably benign breast masses using gray-scale sonography, and thereby to reduce the number of biopsies performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17149763     DOI: 10.1002/jcu.20298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound        ISSN: 0091-2751            Impact factor:   0.910


  8 in total

1.  Growing BI-RADS category 3 lesions on follow-up breast ultrasound: malignancy rates and worrisome features.

Authors:  Su Min Ha; Eun Young Chae; Joo Hee Cha; Hee Jung Shin; Woo Jung Choi; Hak Hee Kim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Interval growth of probably benign breast lesions on follow-up ultrasound: how can these be managed?

Authors:  Hee Jung Moon; Eun-Kyung Kim; Jin Young Kwak; Jung Hyun Yoon; Min Jung Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  The effect of the number of biopsies on the delay in the time from the delivery of mammography results to breast cancer histopathological diagnosis.

Authors:  Adriana Garduño-Alanis; Lizbeth Morales-González; Angélica Ángeles-Llerenas; José Zaim Delgado-Ramírez; Carolina Ortega-Olvera; Gabriela Torres-Mejía
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 2.532

4.  Superb microvascular imaging in diagnosis of breast lesions: a comparative study with contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic microvascular imaging.

Authors:  Xiao-Yun Xiao; Xin Chen; Xiao-Feng Guan; Huan Wu; Wei Qin; Bao-Ming Luo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Probably benign lesions at screening breast US in a population with elevated risk: prevalence and rate of malignancy in the ACRIN 6666 trial.

Authors:  Richard G Barr; Zheng Zhang; Jean B Cormack; Ellen B Mendelson; Wendie A Berg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Clinical significance of interval changes in breast lesions initially categorized as probably benign on breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Ja Yoon Jang; Sun Mi Kim; Jin Hwan Kim; Mijung Jang; Bo La Yun; Jong Yoon Lee; Soo Hyun Lee; Bohyoung Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Can Doppler or contrast-enhanced ultrasound analysis add diagnostically important information about the nature of breast lesions?

Authors:  Daniela Stanzani; Luciano F Chala; Nestor de Barros; Giovanni G Cerri; Maria Cristina Chammas
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  Interobserver agreement in breast ultrasound categorization in the Mammography and Ultrasonography Study for Breast Cancer Screening Effectiveness (MUST-BE) trial: results of a preliminary study.

Authors:  Eun Jung Choi; Eun Hye Lee; You Me Kim; Yun-Woo Chang; Jin Hwa Lee; Young Mi Park; Keum Won Kim; Young Joong Kim; Jae Kwan Jun; Seri Hong
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2018-09-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.