Literature DB >> 17149406

Perceived utility of pharmacy licensure examination preparation tools.

Amy Sutton Peak1, Amy Heck Sheehan, Stephanie Arnett.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify board examination preparation tools most commonly used by recent pharmacy graduates and determine which tools are perceived as most valuable and representative of the actual content of licensure examinations.
METHODS: An electronic survey was sent to all 2004 graduates of colleges of pharmacy in Indiana. Participants identified which specific preparation tools were used and rated tools based on usefulness, representativeness of licensure examination, and monetary value, and provided overall recommendations to future graduates.
RESULTS: The most commonly used preparation tools were the Pharmacy Law Review Session offered by Dr. Thomas Wilson at Purdue University, the Complete Review for Pharmacy, Pre-NAPLEX, PharmPrep, and the Kaplan NAPLEX Review. Tools receiving high ratings in all categories included Dr. Wilson's Pharmacy Law Review Session, Pre-NAPLEX, Comprehensive Pharmacy Review, Kaplan NAPLEX Review, and Review of Pharmacy.
CONCLUSIONS: Although no preparation tool was associated with a higher examination pass rate, certain tools were clearly rated higher than others by test takers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17149406      PMCID: PMC1636933          DOI: 10.5688/aj700225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  1 in total

1.  Analysis of licensure examination performance in relation to prior internship experience.

Authors:  M L House; M P Pevonka
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 2.047

  1 in total
  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of student factors associated with pre-NAPLEX scores.

Authors:  Marie A Chisholm-Burns; Christina A Spivey; Sharon McDonough; Stephanie Phelps; Debbie Byrd
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Implementation of an integrated longitudinal curricular activity for graduating pharmacy students.

Authors:  Reza Karimi; Doug Meyer; Brad Fujisaki; Susan Stein
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Examining the Association Between the NAPLEX, Pre-NAPLEX, and Pre- and Post-admission Factors.

Authors:  Marie A Chisholm-Burns; Christina A Spivey; Debbie C Byrd; Sharon L K McDonough; Stephanie J Phelps
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Creating an Arms Race? Examining School Costs and Motivations for Providing NAPLEX and PCOA Preparation.

Authors:  Lisa Lebovitz; Veronica P Shuford; Margarita V DiVall; Kimberly K Daugherty; Michael J Rudolph
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Impact of Pharmacy School Characteristics on NAPLEX First-time Pass Rates.

Authors:  Jennifer S Williams; Christina A Spivey; Tracy M Hagemann; Stephanie J Phelps; Marie Chisholm-Burns
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.047

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.