Literature DB >> 17149115

Postpartum depression: the reliability of telephone screening.

Anne Marie Mitchell1, Mary E Mittelstaedt, Darlene Schott-Baer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the reliability of screening women for symptoms of postpartum depression by a telephone assessment after hospital discharge. STUDY
DESIGN: Correlational design with a convenience sample of women from a Midwestern community hospital.
METHODS: One hundred and twenty-six women agreed to participate prior to hospital discharge and 106 women were in the final sample (response rate 84%). Telephone contact was made 8 weeks after discharge, when the Postpartum Depression Screening Scale was administered.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven percent of the women screened had scores indicating moderate-to-severe depression (score range 60-128). Reliability coefficients were calculated on the data for the short and long forms of the PDSS, as well as for all seven subscales (alpha coefficients were .72 and .94, respectively, for the short- and long-form totals). Subscale scores for the 35-item form were as follows: sleeping/eating disturbances .80, anxiety/insecurity .77, emotional lability .82, mental confusion .80, loss of self .87, guilt/shame .82, and contemplating harming oneself.90. The correlation between the short-form total and the long-form total was r = .91 (p = < 01.) Studies using the PDSS as an in-person instrument were compared with scores for telephone screening, and the overall mean scores were similar.
CONCLUSION: Telephone screening is a reliable method to screen for postpartum symptomatology that may occur later than the 6-week office visit. Women who are at risk, especially those who have a history of treatment for depression, current treatment for depression or increased anxiety, should be screened for postpartum depression symptomatology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17149115     DOI: 10.1097/00005721-200611000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs        ISSN: 0361-929X            Impact factor:   1.412


  7 in total

1.  Nursing care for postpartum depression, part 1: do nurses think they should offer both screening and counseling?

Authors:  Lisa S Segre; Michael W O'Hara; Stephan Arndt; Cheryl Tatano Beck
Journal:  MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.412

2.  Identification of postpartum depression.

Authors:  Dorothy K Y Sit; Katherine L Wisner
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.190

3.  Genetic variants in the genes of the sex steroid hormone metabolism and depressive symptoms during and after pregnancy.

Authors:  Michael O Schneider; Jutta Pretscher; Tamme W Goecke; Lothar Häberle; Anne Engel; Johannes Kornhuber; Anna Eichler; Arif B Ekici; Matthias W Beckmann; Peter A Fasching; Eva Schwenke
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Screening for depression in the postpartum period: a comparison of three instruments.

Authors:  Barbara H Hanusa; Sarah Hudson Scholle; Roger F Haskett; Kathleen Spadaro; Katherine L Wisner
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Uncovering the Golden Veil: Applying the Evidence for Telephone Screening to Detect Early Postpartum Depression.

Authors:  Dina N BenDavid; Diane F Hunker; Kathleen C Spadaro
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2016

Review 6.  eHealth as the Next-Generation Perinatal Care: An Overview of the Literature.

Authors:  Josephus Fm van den Heuvel; T Katrien Groenhof; Jan Hw Veerbeek; Wouter W van Solinge; A Titia Lely; Arie Franx; Mireille N Bekker
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Genetic variants in the genes of the stress hormone signalling pathway and depressive symptoms during and after pregnancy.

Authors:  Michael Schneider; Anne Engel; Peter A Fasching; Lothar Häberle; Elisabeth B Binder; Franziska Voigt; Jennifer Grimm; Florian Faschingbauer; Anna Eichler; Ulf Dammer; Dirk Rebhan; Manuela Amann; Eva Raabe; Tamme W Goecke; Carina Quast; Matthias W Beckmann; Johannes Kornhuber; Anna Seifert; Stefanie Burghaus
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.