Literature DB >> 17148307

Selectivity of harvesting differs between local and foreign roe deer hunters: trophy stalkers have the first shot at the right place.

Atle Mysterud1, Piotr Tryjanowski, Marek Panek.   

Abstract

Harvesting represents a major source of mortality in many deer populations. The extent to which harvesting is selective for specific traits is important in order to understand contemporary evolutionary processes. In addition, since such data are frequently used in life-history studies, it is important to know the pattern of selectivity as a source of bias. Recently, it was demonstrated that different hunting methods were selected for different weights in red deer (Cervus elaphus), but little insight was offered into why this occurs. In this study, we show that foreign trophy stalkers select for larger antlers when hunting roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) than local hunters, but that close to half of the difference in selectivity was due to foreigners hunting earlier in the season and in locations with larger males. The relationship between antler size and age was nevertheless fairly similar based on whether deer was shot by foreign or local hunters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17148307      PMCID: PMC1833986          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  5 in total

1.  Undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting.

Authors:  David W Coltman; Paul O'Donoghue; Jon T Jorgenson; John T Hogg; Curtis Strobeck; Marco Festa-Bianchet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Comparative ungulate dynamics: the devil is in the detail.

Authors:  T H Clutton-Brock; T Coulson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Mass- and density-dependent reproductive success and reproductive costs in a capital breeder.

Authors:  M Festa-Bianchet; J M Gaillard; J T Jorgenson
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Different hunting strategies select for different weights in red deer.

Authors:  María Martínez; Carlos Rodríguez-Vigal; Owen R Jones; Tim Coulson; Alfonso San Miguel
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Inter-specific synchrony of two contrasting ungulates: wild boar (Sus scrofa) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus).

Authors:  Atle Mysterud; Piotr Tryjanowski; Marek Panek; Nathalie Pettorelli; Nils C Stenseth
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-11-11       Impact factor: 3.225

  5 in total
  11 in total

1.  How constraints affect the hunter's decision to shoot a deer.

Authors:  Florian K Diekert; Andries Richter; Inger Maren Rivrud; Atle Mysterud
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Data from selective harvests underestimate temporal trends in quantitative traits.

Authors:  Fanie Pelletier; Marco Festa-Bianchet; Jon T Jorgenson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Hierarchical path analysis of deer responses to direct and indirect effects of climate in northern forest.

Authors:  Atle Mysterud; Nigel G Yoccoz; Rolf Langvatn; Nathalie Pettorelli; Nils Chr Stenseth
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Human-induced evolution caused by unnatural selection through harvest of wild animals.

Authors:  Fred W Allendorf; Jeffrey J Hard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Interaction effects between weather and space use on harvesting effort and patterns in red deer.

Authors:  Inger M Rivrud; Erling L Meisingset; Leif E Loe; Atle Mysterud
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Human recreation affects spatio-temporal habitat use patterns in red deer (Cervus elaphus).

Authors:  Joy Coppes; Friedrich Burghardt; Robert Hagen; Rudi Suchant; Veronika Braunisch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Relationships of catch-per-unit-effort metrics with abundance vary depending on sampling method and population trajectory.

Authors:  Maximilian L Allen; Nathan M Roberts; Javan M Bauder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Hunter selection for larger and older male bobcats affects annual harvest demography.

Authors:  Maximilian L Allen; Nathan M Roberts; Timothy R Van Deelen
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  Can compensatory culling offset undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting?

Authors:  Atle Mysterud; Richard Bischof
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 5.091

10.  Effects of environmental and anthropogenic landscape features on mule deer harvest in Nebraska.

Authors:  Bryan J O'Connor; Nicolas J Fryda; Dustin H Ranglack
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.