Literature DB >> 17147592

Quantitative sensory testing for spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic neuropathic pain.

Elon Eisenberg1, Misha-Miroslav Backonja, Roger B Fillingim, Dorit Pud, Daniela E Hord, Gary W King, Milan P Stojanovic.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A prospective pilot study was conducted, attempting to identify objective tests that would help clinicians to assess the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) trial preceding permanent device implantation.
SETTING: Four university hospitals in the United States and Israel. PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen patients with radicular leg pain due to failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) or leg pain due to complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) who were candidates for SCS.
METHODS: PARTICIPANTS underwent a series of quantitative sensory tests prior to, and seven days after the initiation of SCS trial. These tests included: vibration threshold (conducted using the VSA 3000; Medoc Inc., Ramat Ishay, Israel), cold threshold, warm threshold, heat pain threshold, phasic heat pain threshold, tonic heat pain threshold (conducted using the TSA 2001; Medoc Inc.), and electrical pain tolerance at 5, 250 and 2000 Hz (administered using the NerveScan 2000; Neurotron, Inc., Baltimore, MD, USA).
RESULTS: Useful data were obtained from 12 patients. The results of the vibration threshold and the tolerance to electrical stimulation at 5 and 250 Hz changed with an SCS trial. These results also correlated with the decision regarding the permanent implantation, which was made independently of them. In contrast, the results of thermal thresholds and tolerance to electrical stimulation at 2000 Hz tests did not change with the SCS trial.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings, which agree with those of a few other studies, suggest that the vibration threshold and the tolerance to electrical stimulation at 5 and 250 Hz tests can assist the clinician to select the right patients for permanent stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17147592     DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2006.00080.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Pract        ISSN: 1530-7085            Impact factor:   3.183


  5 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative sensory testing of neuropathic pain patients: potential mechanistic and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Doreen B Pfau; Christian Geber; Frank Birklein; Rolf-Detlef Treede
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2012-06

2.  Dynamic Pain Phenotypes are Associated with Spinal Cord Stimulation-Induced Reduction in Pain: A Repeated Measures Observational Pilot Study.

Authors:  Claudia M Campbell; Luis F Buenaver; Srinivasa N Raja; Kasey B Kiley; Lauren J Swedberg; Paul W Wacnik; Steven P Cohen; Michael A Erdek; Kayode A Williams; Paul J Christo
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.750

3.  Spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain: evidence and theory for mechanisms of action.

Authors:  Jacob Caylor; Rajiv Reddy; Sopyda Yin; Christina Cui; Mingxiong Huang; Charles Huang; Rao Ramesh; Dewleen G Baker; Alan Simmons; Dmitri Souza; Samer Narouze; Ricardo Vallejo; Imanuel Lerman
Journal:  Bioelectron Med       Date:  2019-06-28

Review 4.  Psychological screening/phenotyping as predictors for spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  Claudia M Campbell; Robert N Jamison; Robert R Edwards
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2013-01

Review 5.  Spinal Cord Stimulation: Clinical Efficacy and Potential Mechanisms.

Authors:  Andrei D Sdrulla; Yun Guan; Srinivasa N Raja
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.183

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.