Literature DB >> 17146617

Coverage of whole proteome by structural genomics observed through protein homology modeling database.

Kei Yura1, Akihiro Yamaguchi, Mitiko Go.   

Abstract

We have been developing FAMSBASE, a protein homology-modeling database of whole ORFs predicted from genome sequences. The latest update of FAMSBASE ( http://daisy.nagahama-i-bio.ac.jp/Famsbase/ ), which is based on the protein three-dimensional (3D) structures released by November 2003, contains modeled 3D structures for 368,724 open reading frames (ORFs) derived from genomes of 276 species, namely 17 archaebacterial, 130 eubacterial, 18 eukaryotic and 111 phage genomes. Those 276 genomes are predicted to have 734,193 ORFs in total and the current FAMSBASE contains protein 3D structure of approximately 50% of the ORF products. However, cases that a modeled 3D structure covers the whole part of an ORF product are rare. When portion of an ORF with 3D structure is compared in three kingdoms of life, in archaebacteria and eubacteria, approximately 60% of the ORFs have modeled 3D structures covering almost the entire amino acid sequences, however, the percentage falls to about 30% in eukaryotes. When annual differences in the number of ORFs with modeled 3D structure are calculated, the fraction of modeled 3D structures of soluble protein for archaebacteria is increased by 5%, and that for eubacteria by 7% in the last 3 years. Assuming that this rate would be maintained and that determination of 3D structures for predicted disordered regions is unattainable, whole soluble protein model structures of prokaryotes without the putative disordered regions will be in hand within 15 years. For eukaryotic proteins, they will be in hand within 25 years. The 3D structures we will have at those times are not the 3D structure of the entire proteins encoded in single ORFs, but the 3D structures of separate structural domains. Measuring or predicting spatial arrangements of structural domains in an ORF will then be a coming issue of structural genomics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17146617      PMCID: PMC1769342          DOI: 10.1007/s10969-006-9010-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics        ISSN: 1345-711X


  61 in total

1.  Structural biology. Structural genomics, round 2.

Authors:  Robert Service
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Addressing the intrinsic disorder bottleneck in structural proteomics.

Authors:  Christopher J Oldfield; Eldon L Ulrich; Yugong Cheng; A Keith Dunker; John L Markley
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005-05-15

3.  Progress of structural genomics initiatives: an analysis of solved target structures.

Authors:  Annabel E Todd; Russell L Marsden; Janet M Thornton; Christine A Orengo
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2005-04-02       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  High-throughput production of prokaryotic membrane proteins.

Authors:  Elena Dobrovetsky; Ming Liang Lu; Ronit Andorn-Broza; Galina Khutoreskaya; James E Bray; Alexei Savchenko; Cheryl H Arrowsmith; Aled M Edwards; Christopher M Koth
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2005

Review 5.  Protein structure prediction: inroads to biology.

Authors:  Donald Petrey; Barry Honig
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 6.  Multiple sequence alignments.

Authors:  Iain M Wallace; Gordon Blackshields; Desmond G Higgins
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 7.  The impact of structural genomics: expectations and outcomes.

Authors:  John-Marc Chandonia; Steven E Brenner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-01-20       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  High-quality homology models derived from NMR and X-ray structures of E. coli proteins YgdK and Suf E suggest that all members of the YgdK/Suf E protein family are enhancers of cysteine desulfurases.

Authors:  Gaohua Liu; Zhaohui Li; Yiwen Chiang; Thomas Acton; Gaetano T Montelione; Diana Murray; Thomas Szyperski
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 9.  Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions.

Authors:  H Jane Dyson; Peter E Wright
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 94.444

10.  MODBASE: a database of annotated comparative protein structure models and associated resources.

Authors:  Ursula Pieper; Narayanan Eswar; Fred P Davis; Hannes Braberg; M S Madhusudhan; Andrea Rossi; Marc Marti-Renom; Rachel Karchin; Ben M Webb; David Eramian; Min-Yi Shen; Libusha Kelly; Francisco Melo; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Unmet challenges of structural genomics.

Authors:  Maksymilian Chruszcz; Marcin Domagalski; Tomasz Osinski; Alexander Wlodawer; Wladek Minor
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 6.809

2.  NMR in structural genomics to increase structural coverage of the protein universe: Delivered by Prof. Kurt Wüthrich on 7 July 2013 at the 38th FEBS Congress in St. Petersburg, Russia.

Authors:  Pedro Serrano; Samit K Dutta; Andrew Proudfoot; Biswaranjan Mohanty; Lukas Susac; Bryan Martin; Michael Geralt; Lukasz Jaroszewski; Adam Godzik; Marc Elsliger; Ian A Wilson; Kurt Wüthrich
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 5.542

3.  The utility of geometrical and chemical restraint information extracted from predicted ligand-binding sites in protein structure refinement.

Authors:  Michal Brylinski; Seung Yup Lee; Hongyi Zhou; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 2.867

Review 4.  Bacteriophage protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Roman Häuser; Sonja Blasche; Terje Dokland; Elisabeth Haggård-Ljungquist; Albrecht von Brunn; Margarita Salas; Sherwood Casjens; Ian Molineux; Peter Uetz
Journal:  Adv Virus Res       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 9.937

Review 5.  Insights into the biology of Escherichia coli through structural proteomics.

Authors:  Allan Matte; Zongchao Jia; S Sunita; J Sivaraman; Miroslaw Cygler
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2007-08-01

6.  Plasmodium falciparum malaria: proteomic studies.

Authors:  Rodrigo Siqueira-Batista; Andréia Patrícia Gomes; Eduardo Gomes de Mendonça; Rodrigo Roger Vitorino; Sarah Fumian Milward de Azevedo; Rodrigo de Barros Freitas; Luiz Alberto Santana; Maria Goreti de Almeida Oliveira
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2012-12

7.  Revisiting gap locations in amino acid sequence alignments and a proposal for a method to improve them by introducing solvent accessibility.

Authors:  Atsushi Hijikata; Kei Yura; Tosiyuki Noguti; Mitiko Go
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-04-04

8.  Preservation of protein clefts in comparative models.

Authors:  David Piedra; Sergi Lois; Xavier de la Cruz
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2008-01-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.