Literature DB >> 17144953

Navicular stress fractures: a prospective study on athletes.

Amol Saxena1, Brian Fullem.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Navicular stress fractures of the foot often are difficult to diagnose and treat.
METHODS: Nineteen athletic patients seen from 1999 to 2003, were compared to a previously treated group of 22 athletes with similar injuries treated from 1994 to 1998. Based on the frontal plane CT images, a previously described classification system was used to assess the injury: type I dorsal cortical break; type II fracture extending into the navicular body; and type III fracture breaches two cortices. Nonoperative treatment was recommended for patients with type I injuries and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) were recommended for those with type II and III injuries. The time to return to activity and ability to return to competition were assessed, along with differences between fracture type and gender.
RESULTS: Return to activity (RTA) was 4.0 months for the entire group. RTA for type I (four injuries), type II (eight injuries), and type III (seven injuries) was 3.8, 3.7, and 4.2 months, respectively. Fifteen of 16 competitive athletes returned to full competition, including all who had ORIF.
CONCLUSIONS: Navicular stress fractures can take 4 months to heal with nonoperative or operative treatment. Surgery should be considered for more severe injuries, which can be assessed by CT scan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17144953     DOI: 10.1177/107110070602701109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  10 in total

Review 1.  Stress fractures of the foot and ankle, part 2: site-specific etiology, imaging, and treatment, and differential diagnosis.

Authors:  Jacob C Mandell; Bharti Khurana; Stacy E Smith
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Delayed healing of a navicular stress fracture, following limited weight-bearing activity.

Authors:  Matthew Robinson; Mark Fulcher
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-03-11

Review 3.  Tarsal navicular stress fractures.

Authors:  Rachel J Shakked; Emily E Walters; Martin J O'Malley
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-03

4.  The non-surgical and surgical treatment of tarsal navicular stress fractures.

Authors:  John R Fowler; John P Gaughan; Barry P Boden; Helene Pavlov; Joseph S Torg
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 5.  Bone stress injuries.

Authors:  Tim Hoenig; Kathryn E Ackerman; Belinda R Beck; Mary L Bouxsein; David B Burr; Karsten Hollander; Kristin L Popp; Tim Rolvien; Adam S Tenforde; Stuart J Warden
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 52.329

Review 6.  Imaging of lower extremity stress fracture injuries.

Authors:  Daniel S Moran; Rachel K Evans; Eran Hadad
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Stress fractures of the foot and ankle in athletes.

Authors:  Stephanie W Mayer; Patrick W Joyner; Louis C Almekinders; Selene G Parekh
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.843

8.  Epidemiology of Navicular Injury at the NFL Combine and Their Impact on an Athlete's Prospective NFL Career.

Authors:  Bryan Vopat; Brendin R Beaulieu-Jones; Gregory Waryasz; Kevin J McHale; George Sanchez; Catherine A Logan; James M Whalen; Christopher W DiGiovanni; Matthew T Provencher
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-08-18

9.  Foot Kinematics Differ Between Runners With and Without a History of Navicular Stress Fractures.

Authors:  James Becker; Stanley James; Louis Osternig; Li-Shan Chou
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-04-20

Review 10.  Return to sport following navicular stress fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis of three hundred and fifteen fractures.

Authors:  Ahmed Khalil Attia; Karim Mahmoud; Jason Bariteau; Sameh A Labib; Christopher W DiGiovanni; Pieter D'Hooghe
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 3.075

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.