Literature DB >> 18348592

Imaging of lower extremity stress fracture injuries.

Daniel S Moran1, Rachel K Evans, Eran Hadad.   

Abstract

Stress reactions and stress fractures in the lower extremities occur frequently in military and athletic populations. As the clinical symptoms of stress fracture may mimic other less severe musculoskeletal injuries, the diagnosis of stress fracture can often be delayed. The following article reviews the characteristics, advantages and disadvantages of the various imaging tools available to detect stress fracture of the lower limbs in order to clarify their utility when diagnosing this condition. Plain radiography, the primary imaging tool for diagnosing suspected stress injuries, may not detect stress fracture injury until fracture healing is well underway. In some cases of suspected stress fracture, this delay in diagnosis can lead to catastrophic fracture and surgical intervention. Bone scintigraphy has long been recommended for the diagnosis of stress fracture, claiming that skeletal scintigraphy is 100% sensitive for the detection of stress fracture. However, there is a potential for a false negative examination and findings might be nonspecific as tumours or infections may mimic stress injury. In addition, bone scintigraphy involves ionizing radiation and it should not be used whenever there is an alternative. Computed tomography (CT) provides exquisitely fine osseous detail, but should be reserved only for specific indications because it also involves ionizing radiation. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, which is noninvasive, has no ionizing radiation, is more rapidly performed than bone scintigraphy, and should be the method of choice for stress fracture diagnosis whenever it is available. However, using MR imaging demands an experienced diagnostician in order to decrease reported false-positive injuries. The ultrasonography technique, which is being used increasingly in the evaluation of the musculoskeletal system has recently been shown to have some potential in the diagnosis of stress fracture; however, currently the imaging modalities are insufficient. The peripheral quantitative CT (pQCT) device, which has been developed to specifically assess skeletal status of the extremities, provides data on bone geometry, strength and density. However, the pQCT needs further evaluation prior to being considered for use in diagnosis stress changes in bone. This article reviews the utility of each of the imaging modalities currently available to detect stress fracture injuries of the lower extremities, as well as other utilization factors, which include exposure to ionizing radiation, the ability to detect early- and late-stage reactions in the bone and surrounding soft tissues, and the ability to differentiate between different types of bone lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18348592     DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200838040-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  57 in total

1.  Power Doppler assessment of vascular changes during fracture treatment with low-intensity ultrasound.

Authors:  Nandkumar M Rawool; Barry B Goldberg; Flemming Forsberg; Alan A Winder; Eric Hume
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  Stress fracture detected sonographically.

Authors:  C B Howard; N Lieberman; G Mozes; M Nyska
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Longitudinal stress fractures of the tibia: comparative study of CT and MR imaging.

Authors:  A Feydy; J Drapé; E Beret; L Sarazin; E Pessis; A Minoui; A Chevrot
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Imaging of stress injuries to bone. Radiography, scintigraphy, and MR imaging.

Authors:  A L Deutsch; M N Coel; J H Mink
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.182

Review 5.  The use of MR imaging in the assessment and clinical management of stress reactions of bone in high-performance athletes.

Authors:  E A Arendt; H J Griffiths
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.182

Review 6.  Stress fractures: current concepts.

Authors:  R H Daffner; H Pavlov
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Tibial periosteal reactions in soldiers. A scintigraphic study of 29 cases of lower leg pain.

Authors:  M B Nielsen; K Hansen; P Hølmer; M Dyrbye
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1991-12

8.  Radiographically negative stress related bone injury. MR imaging versus two-phase bone scintigraphy.

Authors:  J Hodler; H Steinert; M Zanetti; U Frölicher; J Rogala; K Stumpe; G K von Schulthess
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.990

9.  Insufficiency fracture. A survey of 60 cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  Martin Soubrier; Jean-Jacques Dubost; Stephane Boisgard; Bernard Sauvezie; Pierre Gaillard; Jean Luc Michel; Jean Michel Ristori
Journal:  Joint Bone Spine       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.929

10.  Bone stress: a radionuclide imaging perspective.

Authors:  L W Roub; L W Gumerman; E N Hanley; M W Clark; M Goodman; D L Herbert
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Bone stress injuries of the leg in athletes.

Authors:  Michele Gaeta; Achille Mileto; Giorgio Ascenti; Gianmarco Bernava; Alessandra Murabito; Fabio Minutoli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Self-reported versus diagnosed stress fractures in norwegian female elite athletes.

Authors:  Jannike Oyen; Monica Klungland Torstveit; Jorunn Sundgot-Borgen
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 3.  Ultrasound and bone: a pictorial review.

Authors:  Stefano Bianchi
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2020-05-17

4.  Bone turnover markers do not predict stress fracture in elite combat recruits.

Authors:  Ran Yanovich; Rachel K Evans; Eitan Friedman; Daniel S Moran
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Negative magnetic resonance imaging in three cases of anterior tibial cortex stress fractures.

Authors:  Ralph Smith; M Moghal; J L Newton; N Jones; J Teh
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Update on stress fractures in female athletes: epidemiology, treatment, and prevention.

Authors:  Yin-Ting Chen; Adam S Tenforde; Michael Fredericson
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-06

7.  Candidate gene analysis in israeli soldiers with stress fractures.

Authors:  Ran Yanovich; Eitan Friedman; Roni Milgrom; Bernice Oberman; Laurence Freedman; Daniel S Moran
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

8.  DISTAL FIBULAR STRESS FRACTURE IN A FEMALE RECREATIONAL RUNNER: A CASE REPORT WITH MUSCULOSKELETAL ULTRASOUND IMAGING FINDINGS.

Authors:  Lisa T Hoglund; Karin Grävare Silbernagel; Nicholas R Taweel
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-12

9.  Functional polymorphisms in the P2X7 receptor gene are associated with stress fracture injury.

Authors:  Ian Varley; Julie P Greeves; Craig Sale; Eitan Friedman; Daniel S Moran; Ran Yanovich; Peter J Wilson; Alison Gartland; David C Hughes; Trent Stellingwerff; Craig Ranson; William D Fraser; James A Gallagher
Journal:  Purinergic Signal       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 3.765

10.  Stress fractures of the ankle malleoli diagnosed by ultrasound: a report of 6 cases.

Authors:  Stefano Bianchi; Dien Hung Luong
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.