Literature DB >> 17144322

Communication of radiation-induced stress or bystander signals between fish in vivo.

C Mothersill1, C Bucking, R W Smith, N Agnihotri, A Oneill, M Kilemade, C B Seymour.   

Abstract

We report data in this paper suggesting that fish irradiated to 0.5 Gy total body dose can release factors into the water that signal other unexposed fish and cause induction of bystander effects expressed as increased cell death in a reporter system. Radiation-induced bystander effects, resulting in the appearance of radiation damage or induction of typical radiation responses in unirradiated cells and tissues are now an established consequence of exposure to low doses of ionizing radiation, however little work has been done in vivo or in species other than humans or mice. In these experiments rainbow trout were irradiated and then paired with unirradiated fish for two hours. Additionally, unirradiated fish were placed in water which had previously been used to hold irradiated fish for 2 h. Sham-irradiated fish and absolute control fish were also examined all using blind protocols. Following a two h incubation period, at these various exposure regimes, the fish were killed by a blow to the head and dissected. Five organs were removed from each fish and tissue explants were cultured using an established technique. After 2 days, the culture medium was harvested and used in a reporter assay to determine whether a bystander effect had been induced. The explants were cultured on in Clonetics growth medium for a further 14 days then fixed for assay of radiation response proteins. The responses varied according to the cell type in the original explants, with the gill and fin showing the most pronounced response. The results suggest that communication signals leading to a typical radiation response can be passed between fish and seem to involve secretion of a chemical messenger into the water.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17144322     DOI: 10.1021/es061099y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  17 in total

1.  Radiation Induced Bystander Effect in vivo.

Authors:  Yunfei Chai; Tom K Hei
Journal:  Acta Med Nagasaki       Date:  2008

2.  Injection of resperpine into zebrafish, prevents fish to fish communication of radiation-induced bystander signals: confirmation in vivo of a role for serotonin in the mechanism.

Authors:  Rohin Saroya; Richard Smith; Colin Seymour; Carmel Mothersill
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Transmission of signals from rats receiving high doses of microbeam radiation to cage mates: an inter-mammal bystander effect.

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; Cristian Fernandez-Palomo; Jennifer Fazzari; Richard Smith; Elisabeth Schültke; Elke Bräuer-Krisch; Jean Laissue; Christian Schroll; Colin Seymour
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Radiation induced bystander effects in mice given low doses of radiation in vivo.

Authors:  Harleen Singh; Rohin Saroya; Richard Smith; Rebecca Mantha; Lynda Guindon; Ron E J Mitchel; Colin Seymour; Carmel Mothersill
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Alternative medicine techniques have non-linear effects on radiation response and can alter the expression of radiation induced bystander effects.

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; Richard Smith; Matthew Henry; Colin Seymour; Raimond Wong
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 6.  Key mechanisms involved in ionizing radiation-induced systemic effects. A current review.

Authors:  Ifigeneia V Mavragani; Danae A Laskaratou; Benjamin Frey; Serge M Candéias; Udo S Gaipl; Katalin Lumniczky; Alexandros G Georgakilas
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.524

7.  Radiation-induced bystander effect in large Japanese field mouse (Apodemus speciosus) embryonic cells.

Authors:  Kentaro Ariyoshi; Tomisato Miura; Kosuke Kasai; Nakata Akifumi; Yohei Fujishima; Mitsuaki A Yoshida
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 8.  Field carcinogenesis and biological significance of the potential of the bystander effect: carcinogenesis, therapeutic response, and tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kuwano; Takehiko Yokobori; Tatsuya Miyazaki; Makoto Sohda; Tomonori Yoshida; Yoko Azuma; Hironori Tatsuki; Yasunari Ubukata; Nobuhiro Nakazawa; Kengo Kuriyama; Akihiko Sano; Makoto Sakai; Hiroomi Ogawa; Hiroshi Saeki; Ken Shirabe
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Coupling of cell fate selection model enhances DNA damage response and may underlie BE phenomenon.

Authors:  Gökhan Demirkıran; Güleser Kalaycı Demir; Cüneyt Güzeliş
Journal:  IET Syst Biol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.615

Review 10.  REVIEW OF QUANTITATIVE MECHANISTIC MODELS OF RADIATION-INDUCED NON-TARGETED EFFECTS (NTE).

Authors:  Igor Shuryak; David J Brenner
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 0.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.