AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The association between lower birthweight and metabolic syndrome may result from fetal undernutrition (fetal programming hypothesis) and/or genes causing both low birthweight and insulin resistance (fetal insulin hypothesis). We studied associations between the birthweight of parents and metabolic syndrome in the offspring. METHODS: We identified men and women (aged 35-68 years), who had been born in Holdsworth Memorial Hospital, Mysore, India. We also identified the offspring (20-46 years) of these men and women. In total, 283 offspring of 193 mothers and 223 offspring of 144 fathers were studied. Investigations included anthropometry, oral glucose tolerance, plasma insulin and lipid concentrations and blood pressure. The metabolic syndrome was defined using WHO criteria. RESULTS: Among the offspring, lower birthweight was associated with an increased risk of glucose intolerance (impaired glucose tolerance, impaired fasting glucose or type 2 diabetes) and higher cholesterol and triacylglycerol concentrations (p < 0.05 for all adjusted for sex and age). Most outcomes in the offspring, including most individual components of the metabolic syndrome, were unrelated to parental birthweight. However, both maternal and paternal birthweight were inversely related to offspring metabolic syndrome (odds ratio [OR] 0.36 [95% CI: 0.13-1.01] per kg, p = 0.053 for mother-offspring pairs; OR 0.26 [0.07-0.93], p = 0.04 for father-offspring pairs, adjusted for offspring age, sex, BMI and socioeconomic status). Maternal birthweight was inversely related to offspring systolic blood pressure (beta = -2.5 mmHg [-5.00 to 0.03] per kg maternal birthweight; p = 0.052). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Factors in both parents may influence the risk of metabolic syndrome in their offspring. There are several possible explanations, but the findings are consistent with the fetal insulin (genetic) hypothesis.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The association between lower birthweight and metabolic syndrome may result from fetal undernutrition (fetal programming hypothesis) and/or genes causing both low birthweight and insulin resistance (fetal insulin hypothesis). We studied associations between the birthweight of parents and metabolic syndrome in the offspring. METHODS: We identified men and women (aged 35-68 years), who had been born in Holdsworth Memorial Hospital, Mysore, India. We also identified the offspring (20-46 years) of these men and women. In total, 283 offspring of 193 mothers and 223 offspring of 144 fathers were studied. Investigations included anthropometry, oral glucose tolerance, plasma insulin and lipid concentrations and blood pressure. The metabolic syndrome was defined using WHO criteria. RESULTS: Among the offspring, lower birthweight was associated with an increased risk of glucose intolerance (impaired glucose tolerance, impaired fasting glucose or type 2 diabetes) and higher cholesterol and triacylglycerol concentrations (p < 0.05 for all adjusted for sex and age). Most outcomes in the offspring, including most individual components of the metabolic syndrome, were unrelated to parental birthweight. However, both maternal and paternal birthweight were inversely related to offspring metabolic syndrome (odds ratio [OR] 0.36 [95% CI: 0.13-1.01] per kg, p = 0.053 for mother-offspring pairs; OR 0.26 [0.07-0.93], p = 0.04 for father-offspring pairs, adjusted for offspring age, sex, BMI and socioeconomic status). Maternal birthweight was inversely related to offspring systolic blood pressure (beta = -2.5 mmHg [-5.00 to 0.03] per kg maternal birthweight; p = 0.052). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Factors in both parents may influence the risk of metabolic syndrome in their offspring. There are several possible explanations, but the findings are consistent with the fetal insulin (genetic) hypothesis.
Authors: S R Veena; K Kumaran; M N Swarnagowri; M N Jayakumar; S D Leary; C E Stein; V A Cox; C H D Fall Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 3.980
Authors: Chittaranjan S Yajnik; Charu V Joglekar; Anand N Pandit; Ashish R Bavdekar; Swati A Bapat; Sheila A Bhave; Samantha D Leary; Caroline H D Fall Journal: Diabetes Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: T D Adams; A O Hammoud; L E Davidson; B Laferrère; A Fraser; J B Stanford; M Hashibe; J L J Greenwood; J Kim; D Taylor; A J Watson; K R Smith; R McKinlay; S C Simper; S C Smith; S C Hunt Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2015-02-03 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Ian J Rickard; Alexandre Courtiol; Andrew M Prentice; Anthony J C Fulford; Tim H Clutton-Brock; Virpi Lummaa Journal: Proc Biol Sci Date: 2012-08-15 Impact factor: 5.349
Authors: William R Scott; Weihua Zhang; Marie Loh; Sian-Tsung Tan; Benjamin Lehne; Uzma Afzal; Juan Peralta; Richa Saxena; Sarju Ralhan; Gurpreet S Wander; Kiymet Bozaoglu; Dharambir K Sanghera; Paul Elliott; James Scott; John C Chambers; Jaspal S Kooner Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-05-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Murali Krishna; Kumaran Kalyanaraman; S R Veena; G V Krishanveni; S C Karat; Vanessa Cox; Patsy Coakley; Kiran Nagaraj; Claudia Stein; Bdr Paul; Martin Prince; Clive Osmond; Caroline Hd Fall Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2015-10-07 Impact factor: 7.196