Literature DB >> 17143240

Early experience from the application of a noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging-based measurement of intracranial pressure in hydrocephalus.

Roberta P Glick1, Josh Niebruegge, Sang H Lee, Osbert Egibor, Terry Lichtor, Noam Alperin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The decision for surgical intervention in hydrocephalic patients presenting with symptoms suggesting raised intracranial pressure (ICP) is challenging because radiographic ventricular size often lacks the specificity to predict abnormal ICP. An early assessment of the potential clinical usefulness of a noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging-based measurement of ICP (MR-ICP) in symptomatic hydrocephalic patients is reported.
METHODS: Twenty-seven symptomatic hydrocephalic patients (18 with shunts and 9 without shunts) underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging-based studies that included measurements of cerebrospinal fluid and blood flows to and from the cranial vault, from which measurements of ICP were derived using a previously described algorithm. The predictive values of the MR-ICP measurement were determined on the basis of whether or not the patient underwent a surgical treatment of a shunt placement or shunt revision within a 3-month period after the magnetic resonance imaging-based study.
RESULTS: MR-ICP values in these patients spanned a much wider range than in healthy control subjects. However, the majority of the patients (20 out of 26 patients) had MR-ICP values within the normal range. The short-term follow-up of patients who had normal MR-ICP measurement reveals that only one of the 20 patients required surgery. Consequently, the MR-ICP measurement has a strong negative predictive value (95% for all patients and 100% for patients without a shunt).
CONCLUSION: A finding of a normal MR-ICP value in hydrocephalic patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of abnormal ICP is a strong predictor for resolution of symptoms or stable outcome without surgical intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17143240     DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000245586.23710.EF

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  8 in total

Review 1.  Non-invasive intracranial pressure assessment.

Authors:  Llewellyn C Padayachy
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 2.  Noninvasive assessment of cerebrospinal fluid pressure.

Authors:  Beau B Bruce
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  [Non-invasive estimation of intracranial pressure : MR-based evaluation in children with hydrocephalus].

Authors:  M Muehlmann; D Steffinger; A Peraud; M Lehner; F Heinen; N Alperin; B Ertl-Wagner; I K Koerte
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Influence of the compliance of the neck arteries and veins on the measurement of intracranial volume change by phase-contrast MRI.

Authors:  Rong-Wen Tain; Birgit Ertl-Wagner; Noam Alperin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Inter- and intra-rater reliability of blood and cerebrospinal fluid flow quantification by phase-contrast MRI.

Authors:  Inga Koerte; Caroline Haberl; Michael Schmidt; Andreas Pomschar; Sang Lee; Petra Rapp; Denise Steffinger; Rong-Wen Tain; Noam Alperin; Birgit Ertl-Wagner
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  The pulsating brain: A review of experimental and clinical studies of intracranial pulsatility.

Authors:  Mark E Wagshul; Per K Eide; Joseph R Madsen
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2011-01-18

Review 7.  Review: pathophysiology of intracranial hypertension and noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring.

Authors:  Nicolas Canac; Kian Jalaleddini; Samuel G Thorpe; Corey M Thibeault; Robert B Hamilton
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2020-06-23

8.  Non-invasive assessment of pulsatile intracranial pressure with phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Geir Ringstad; Erika Kristina Lindstrøm; Svein Are Sirirud Vatnehol; Kent-André Mardal; Kyrre Eeg Emblem; Per Kristian Eide
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.